A French Academic Proposes Giving French Muslims Their Own State

From one bad idea to another:

A French academic has suggested creating a Muslim state within France in order to prevent a civil war.

Professor Christian de Moliner claims that a second society has formed in France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.

“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.

“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”

Out-grops cannot exist in peace in close proximity.

The problem when you have two opposed groups facing off is that those groups have a baseline of amygdala that motivates hostility at all times. That baseline amygdala needs relief. Relief comes from feeling that the other group has endured some cost. But amygdalae tend to adapt their perceptions to normalize any relief – something they do with pleasures much more readily than they do with hostilities.

So if group A and group B are in contact, they will always feel hostility for each other, and that will always provoke aggression, until it is relieved by some sort of acting out. If group A hits group B, it will feel better, and that will attenuate the hatred somewhat. But it doesn’t last. Even if Group B takes the hit, as the West is increasingly shown itself willing to do (due to increased resources and pleasure deadening amygdala, producing increased r and less baseline amygdala-angst), group A’s angst will naturally rise as they adapt to see the relief as normal, and they will hit again to seek another bout of relief above the new normal baseline.

These things tend to inevitably seek a balance of amygdala on each side, before forcing the two sides to war. Eventually group B will reach the point where it will have sufficient amygdala from the endured attacks to hit back. Eventually it will have to, or group A will just keep hitting until it has destroyed or taken over group B entirely.

Behind all of it is resource availability. If the resources are high, amygdalae can be deadened some and these things can fester. But when the resources plummet, they conflagrate. Clearly even French academics now are realizing the Muslims will never assimilate, itself a sign of increasing amygdalae.

For now, satiated French amygdalae are trying to find a way forward that doesn’t involve Holocaust 2.0, The Muslim Edition. But let resources plummet, and the Muslims will quickly be scapegoated for all the sins of the Western elites, in addition to their own rapes, robberies, and murders. And once the French treat the Muslims as enemies, the Muslims will rapidly reciprocate.

At that point, it will become clear where those antiquated notions of borders and citizenships came from. It will also become clear why Europe was a Christian nation that frowned on other religions in the past. It wasn’t to discriminate against other religions, so much as to avoid the mass bloodshed that allowing other religions to gain a foothold would produce.

It is kind of funny. We view the ideas of no borders and welcomed foreigners as insane while the left would feel the same way about the old times of Christian dominance and assiduous discrimination against outsiders. But the human brain is smarter than us, and the truth is the left’s strategy is probably a good way to avoid mortality and conflict in times of high resources. The only problem is the left has no idea that resources are about to constrict, and that when they do you will need to behave differently.

They’re about to get an awakening.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because amygdalae will not allow compromise