It is funny to read stuff in light of r/K Theory. Courtesy of a commenter:
Scientists are investigating what may be the oldest identified race war 13,000 years after it raged on the fringes of the Sahara.
French scientists working in collaboration with the British Museum have been examining dozens of skeletons, a majority of whom appear to have been killed by archers using flint-tipped arrows.
The bones – from Jebel Sahaba on the east bank of the Nile in northern Sudan – are from victims of the world’s oldest known relatively large-scale human armed conflict…
What’s more, the period in which they perished so violently was one of huge competition for resources – for they appear to have been killed during a severe climatic downturn in which many water sources dried up, especially in summer time.
The climatic downturn – known as the Younger Dryas period – had been preceded by much lusher, wetter and warmer conditions which had allowed populations to expand. But when climatic conditions temporarily worsened during the Younger Dryas, water holes dried up, vegetation wilted and animals died or moved to the only major year-round source of water still available – the Nile.
Humans of all ethnic groups in the area were forced to follow suit – and migrated to the banks (especially the eastern bank) of the great river. Competing for finite resources, human groups would have inevitably clashed – and the current investigation is demonstrating the apparent scale of this earliest known substantial human conflict.
You know how it played out. Resources were relatively free, women became less stressed, and less sexually restricted. Many began to need strange men to sexually excite their amygdala, which led to spreading bet. Men began to avoid fights and let things slide, as socially-posturing males slid up the social ladder on image rather than ability, and gained mating opportunities in return. Out-groups interacted and mixed, without significant violence, because it just wasn’t worth it.
Things were easy going, if irritating for the few remaining K-strategists. They really felt out of place and maladapted in this strange r-world, devoid of K-morals, and filled with a rapidly degenerating, increasingly imbecilic form of human, concerned only with avoiding danger and mating, while pretending to be superior for it.
Then resources grew scarce. Somebody had to die. Suddenly K-strategists began wantonly filling graves with less intelligent, less adapted, less practically capable r-strategists. The K-strategist’s world began to make more sense, as they began to feel more at home and at ease.
Stressed women sought safety by monopolizing the most capable men in monogamous relationships, and weirdness in potential mates piled so much on their amygdala it freaked them out. Morals within the group returned to those morals of the K-strategist, to foster group cohesion. Trust grew among compatriots. Things were harder, and failure had cost, but the K-strategists felt they were exactly as they should be. And as all of this occurred, the active selection for ability gradually produced a smarter, more capable, more intelligent form of human.
Thousands of years later, we are still digging up the bodies of the defectives they planted, even as we are about to begin our own K-shift.
There is an elegance to it. The more things change, the more they stay the same. The only difference is, this time we may come out of our K-shift with an understanding of the mechanism, which could, possibly, affect to what degree we continue this cycle.
[…] The World’s First Race War Was K-selected […]
AC, this is likely wrong
“Stressed women sought safety by monopolizing the most capable men in monogamous relationships” – there is evidence based on genetic drift, that 80% of women through history have had offspring that are alive now. Only 40% of men have. This means each man (historically) has had 2 women he sired off spring with.
This could be monogamous in series, but more likely is multi wife. But then to the ancient man, women are just one more natural resource. It is also worth noting that in aboriginal tribes, where there is little wealth, monogamy is the standard. But as soon as a ‘big man’ can start supporting multiple women and the resultant quantity of children, we see polygamy become a life style. But only one way until the modern age – that is only men having multi partners.
It is an argument you can make. I think it is tough to tell from the single number, though. If 40% of men have bred, maybe 60% were killed, and most of the rest were in monogamous relationships. The other 40% of women may have been impregnated by a very small number of ultra-alpha males, and all of that is skewing the numbers. I mean what is Heartiste’s notch count? 200? 500? What would the notch count of a King or Duke have been? One royal family could impregnate as many women as all of the peasants below them, if they wanted.
I forget the exact numbers, but something like 80% of people in part of Asia now, are believed to be descended from Ghengis Kahn. That means if 40% of men there bred, most others were not impregnating multiple females, and given Khan’s conquests, the rest could all be dead.
Plus those numbers are going to skew based on r-periods vs K-periods, and times of unusual circumstances. During times of r in the primitive past in r-regions, or in front of the migration, where the population was filled with novelty-seeking travelers, every woman may have been bedding a small handful of alpha guys. Or in past times, there may have been times when the King sent for who he wanted, while everyone else starved and couldn’t have children.
I think much of it rests on danger and threat. Where it exists in large enough amount that a single man needs a group to fight with, women will need a dedicated man, since polygamy won’t keep them or the children alive, and the group’s cohesiveness will benefit from monogamy. Where that threat is absent, the r-women will disregard the usefulness of men and follow their libido.
As I learn more and more about r/K from you, I look back at my life and say, hey, that’s what happened in 95 and 85 and 75 and 65 . My early years were formed by reading Robert Ringer , then in my sales years I expanded my knowledge of people through the recently deceased Zig Ziglar. Now in my late years I look at the whole world, not just my work, as more of a game .