The US now has a genital mutilation problem:
Critics of United States policies allowing widespread Muslim immigration often cite increased Islamic violence across Europe as a motivating factor in their opposition. While such faith-based attacks have occurred in the U.S. over recent months, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently noted an even more glaring trend associated with increased immigration from certain Middle Eastern nations.
More than a half million women and girls currently living in the United States have either received or are in danger of receiving the violent procedure known as female genital mutilation.
This number, the CDC found, is about three times higher than in 1990.
Clearly it is all those Polish Christian immigrants.
Britain has Muslim clerics telling their followers that taking sex slaves is no problem:
A hardline Muslim preacher suspected of radicalising three British jihadis told teenage disciples that it is ‘permissible’ under Islam to have sex slaves.
Ali Hammuda, an Imam at a Cardiff mosque where three young jihadis from the city worshipped before travelling to Syria to join Islamic State, also told the group of boys as young as 13 that the ‘day of judgment is close’ – a key part of IS’s warped propaganda.
If Priests were saying it is acceptable to kill abortion providers, who would the left blame? And where exactly is a British Muslim supposed to procure a sex slave?
German authorities are realizing they have a problem, but they are still hiding it from the public:
The internal report was issued for officers of the Criminal Commisariat 12 – responsible for sex crimes and missing persons – and states: ‘The K12 can confirm a surge in sex crimes at these establishments.
‘In particular rape and the sexual abuse of children in bathing establishments have given us grave cause for concern.
‘The perpetrators are, for the most part, immigrants.’
The Bild newspaper revealed the document on Monday – just six months after the nightmare scenes in Cologne on New Year’s Eve when the German welcome mat for refugees was well and truly rolled up.
Some Germans, still not getting it, want to mix nudists pools with Muslim lifeguards:
Nudists were told they would be ‘exterminated’ after a gang of Muslims who stormed into a German swimming pool yelling ‘Allahu Akbar’.
The six men, described as being in their 20s and with beards, spat at women and children because they were swimming in the nude and called all the females ‘sluts’.
The revelers were at a pool in the town of Geldern in the North Rhine-Westphalia region, known for its preference for natural form of swimming…
Meanwhile the professional swimming association in Germany wants to reduce escalating sex attacks by refugees at public baths by training migrants to become pool lifeguards…
The idea of turning them into lifeguards responsible for security, order and cleanliness, water quality monitoring and maintenance of technical equipment would lead to a decrease in sex crimes, the group claims…
But Cologne lifeguard chief Berthold Schmitt believes there is a ‘fundamental problem’ for refugees in 6,000 indoor and outdoor and school swimming pools in Germany.
He said: ‘The ‘new people’, as we call them, have three problems: they speak no German, have no knowledge of German or European bathing culture, and most cannot swim.’
At least 20 refugees are reported to have drowned in Germany this year.
That’s even better. They’re going to hire people who can’t swim to be lifeguards. You wonder how many of the drownings are accidental, how many were Germans taking out the trash, and how many were refugee children killed by men who had just molested them.
This election is where we decide if we want our nation to become a third world Muslim shithole, or soar forth to become the premier first-world nation in the entire world. Every case is demonstrating clearly that third world immigration produces societal degradation. Third world countries are third world countries because their people are third world people. Import them, and your nation will gradually develop third world problems, in direct proportion to the number of third worlders you import.
This will sink in now, because it is the reality, and because we are importing third worlders in sufficient numbers to demonstrate it clearly. And, of course, resources are restricting, which will make people care enough to actually act.
Nah, we’ve seen the results of having MEers run things in the ME. This would lead to no security, no order, filthiness, toxic water quality and broken technical equipment.
Any facility run by refugees in Germany will be scrap in 12 months.
[…] Muslims Immigrants Bring Problems […]
“Life guards” or “lie guards” guards of the lie of Islam
Anonymous Conservative, as someone who knows a few good Muslims, and as someone who knows a few good Jews, I nonetheless believe you’ve accurately portrayed a few of the problems involved in colonization of European societies. My anecdotes and personal desires have no bearing on the observable effects of permitting Muslims to colonize European-based societies.
I wonder…can you imagine what would happen if large numbers of Muslims began controlling the American media, American universities, and American finance? Would you attribute any of the predictable effects to the ethnic identity of those Muslims, and their shared interests?
You have a point, but I try to view it from outside my own perspective.
I think the issue is, what happens to a population when K comes? Groups in-group, and the out-group get’s screwed. Historically, Muslims are the worst out-group-screwers, in part because they have the most violent and callous radicals, and maybe an IQ/anger issue in those radicals. I view that as bad, but if I were a Muslim, would I care? Perspective matters.
Jews do in-group strongly, and a by product is they will out-group strongly. But I don’t think they are nearly as bad as the Muslims under those circumstances. Still, if I was a Jew, would this be a big problem for me?
The issue is this is all ego-centric. My European ancestors would in-group weakly, until things become very bad, at which point they will depopulate and extinct everything within a 1000 mile radius. Great if I am European, not so much if I am Muslim.
A lot of sites try to status signal by banning racism, ethnocentrism, anti-Semitism, etc. I don’t here, because the competitiveness is a sign of K, and I think it is good. If we are slightly split up, and everyone, Irish, Blacks, Germans, Asians, Jews etc are all pushing each other around and competing with each other, then our amygdala are jacked, and we are more ready for what is coming.
Now, my main point is I hate Jewish rabbits who take control of media, education, and finance. But I don’t want that hate to eclipse the hate I have for Bill Ayers, Barack Obama, Valerie Jarret, Bill Clinton, Hillary, and the rest of the rabbits. If all you focus on are “the Jews,” one, you will be creating resistance to the ascension of K in the form of Jewish K’s who might join with you otherwise in eradicating rabbitism, but who you will have to fight instead, because you will give them no choice.
Second, you are giving cover to a lot of non-Jew rabbits, who will lead the charge to kill all the Jews, if it will save them from the ire of the mob.Nobody will be more for the holocaust than Bill Ayers, if it is how he will save his own ass.
My hope is if real K comes (and it will eventually) we will have enough ability to discriminate to separate the battle lines along the lines of r and K.
Now maybe it is a pipe dream. It is not impossible the human machine is only designed, under stressful conditions, to make broad discriminations along clear demarcations. Maybe (and maybe probably) when the shit hits, everything will separate along racial and religious lines, and the war will be on while the rabbits hide. Certainly it is how it has worked in history. In that case, then trying to make the war be along r and K will have been a waste. But I would like to see if, in the massive scale of time, we could do something different that would produce a more pure form of K that would endure through times of r.
I really think nothing would be as beautiful as living in a population where things never went r. IMagine, all you had was a 1950’s culture, and national pride, and work ethic, etc, and it never degraded as the wealth and success accumulated. That too, might be a pipe dream. But if it is to happen, natural selection has to operate along r/K rather than race/religion, etc. If that doesn’t change, rabbitism will be around forever, because the rabbits will always have a generalized classification to hide in.
Now if someday K-rebels are trying to kill Jewish rabbits, and Jewish K’s come to their aid and fight the K-rebels, that is simply how it worked, and the battle will play out. Until then, I have always believed if you are going to do something, go all in and try to get everything that is humanly possible.
I hope we can make it r vs K, and that is what I will shoot for here, just because that is my nature.
Bill Ayers, Barack Obama, Valerie Jarret, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton are all rabid Israeli-firsters. The only reason they have influence on your life is because of the Jewish invasion of American politics and finance. Without that, Bill Ayers would be muttering in a psych ward, Barack Obama would be deported to Kenya, Bill Clinton would be under indictment for lying too often to used-car customers, Hillary would be sleeping with the president of some small-town bank (and terrorizing the local PTA), and Valerie Jarrett would be–well, she’s actually Jewish, so she’d be a dhimmi living under Islamic rule, rather than a malignant leech despoiling America on behalf of Israel.
Without Jews, there would be very little “r” in European societies. All the dumbass traitor goys pushing “r” behavior were raised on Jewish-published pedagogy, movies, books, newspapers, and human resources departments. What you call “r” is Jewish influence, and it only began to be tolerated when Semitics started spreading into Europe.
Without Jews in our societies, r would remain among the populations that naturally act that way–Siberian-Americans (Aztecs or “Hispanics”) and Negroids (blacks)–and its occurrence among European peoples would be a ghastly rarity.
On another note: it’s ironic the way you approach the problem of r/K. You do it in a Jewish way, which is to say, chemotherapy: you harm healthy cells in hopes of also killing cancer cells along the way. White “r” people would not be r if not for Jewish influence. Remove that influence, and your people would mostly be K anyway.
However, what Jews would prefer is that you fight your own kind, destroying them to save them, while Jews carefully shelter their own kind.
Israel has universal healthcare, which we pay for. In the meantime, white American children skip seeing the doctor and can’t afford to eat healthy. And we’re STILL paying Israel, millions of dollars per DAY. They look out for their own nation at our expense. We’ll become healthy not by flaying ourselves, but by curing the infection.
We disagree here, because I know white non-Jew r’s, and they are r to the core, and would be r even if they never met a Jew, ever. Clinton, Hillary, Obama, they would all still have irritating shitlib faces, feelings of superiority, and that social manipulating psychology. And if you removed every Jew, nuked Israel, and made Jewishness a death-sentence, they would still be r, multiply, and gather to try and lobby for oppression of K’s.
r is unavoidable if you introduce enough resources. In part because it will r-ify the predisposed r’s, and in part because it will weaken the resolve and drive of non-r’s. It is inherent to human populations, even if there is a natural variation in the numbers. Even if you want to say Ice-age populations have less drive to turn r, the problem is the wealth and greatness they produce is so immense it is practically an unstoppable force driving them r.
Look, we’re going to see how this plays out, in the very near future, because K is coming. The bottom line is I suspect we are all pissing in the wind, and history is going to do what history is designed to do, regardless of any of our protestations.
“r is unavoidable if you introduce enough resources.”
If you’re a Christian, you just blasphemed. It’s one thing to say that everyone except Christ is capable of sin; it’s another thing to say that, if food is ample, everyone will become a homosexual glutton. If what you say is true, then Heaven is Hell and sin is irrelevant, because sin isn’t about an individual’s free will; instead, it’s a by-product of environment. Jesus, what a liberal viewpoint–everything we do is not our own fault, it’s just caused by how much we have or don’t have. See how deep the cancer runs? Even you, the supposed great conservative, can in 2016 say something like “We are blank slates programmed for success or failure based upon the resources given to us in our environment.” That’s the affirmative action, safe-spaces, EBT-card argument.
That concept–the concept that we are intrinsically irredeemable–is an important aspect of the poisonous narrative woven into our lives over the past several centuries. It’s nonsense, of course. If it were true, then people would become more “r” the more resources they had access to. Accordingly, Trump the decabillionaire should be more r than Hillary the decamillionaire, and so forth.
And yet, that’s not the case. Something else is the dependent variable. Some people are more susceptible to believing the old Semitic lies than others. With #BlackLivesMatter we’ve seen again how different genetic structures make certain populations more or less vulnerable to exploitation.
Why is congenitally wealthy Donald J. Trump less “r” than congenitally wealthy George W. Bush? What makes the Hilton children approach wealth one way, and the Trump children approach wealth another way? What makes some American adults so incredibly supportive of Jewish cultural restructuring and what makes some resistant? There are clearly elements of genetics, parenting, and free will at play here.
Like any other half-seeing libertarian, most of what you resist will end up being the Jewish agenda anyway. For example, if you resist forcing working white people to subsidize millions of violent, wildly breeding blacks and mestizos, you are anti-Jewish, working in direct opposition to the policies of the primarily Jewish people who introduced the Federal Reserve, the income tax, and welfare. If you resist sacrificing thousands of our citizens and earning global enmity in order to destroy countries that are a threat to Israel but not to us, you’re anti-Jewish. If you resist open borders and mass rape and Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel, you are anti-Jewish.
Some day, God willing, you will realize that nearly every disgusting facet of our unjust government–the lügenpresse, the random wars and occupations, the child sexualization, the gun grabs, the abstract art, the affirmative action, the political correctness, the immigrant invasion–is a Jewish creation, and you will feel free and amazed, like a man finally receiving his first paycheck free of any deductions or withholdings to that nasty tumor Bernard Baruch and company have been using to rob us for over a hundred years.
You are reading too much into one line and too quick to accuse your brothers.
There will always be some that sin. (Matthew 13). Free resources temp those who are weak to excesses, and weaken the resolve of the good to help the weak through that temptation, because they are under so much temptation themselves.
That is exactly what AC said above if you just read and stop letting the birds steal the corn.
Also, go back and read mark 19:23 again and tell me that Jesus didn’t say the same thing AC said.
Islam is incompatible with the cultures of Western societies. Inviting Muslim to settle here is such a preposterous idea that it could only have been entertained and implemented by the “intellectual class” which is renowned for hating the values handed on by tradition and conservative disposition.