A growing number of Americans are having gay sex, or at least admitting to it. And that’s OK with more and more of us…
The behavioral trend, reflected in an annual survey conducted between 1973 and 2014, was fueled largely by people who had sex with both men and women. There has been little change in the number of people reporting exclusively homosexual behavior.
The number of U.S. adults who said they had at least one same-sex sexual partner doubled between the early 1990s – that question wasn’t asked earlier – and the early 2010s, from 3.6 to 8.7 percent for women and from 4.5 to 8.2 percent for men. Bisexual behavior rose from 3.1 to 7.7 percent, accounting for most of the change…
Meanwhile, the percentage of respondents who said they believed same-sex behavior was “not wrong at all” rose dramatically, from 11 percent in 1973 and 13 percent in 1990 to 49 percent in 2014.
This is all r-selection and amygdala atrophy. Men are becoming drawn to more manly women, because manly women are what dominate in r-selection, where men don’t commit, and the females have to raise their kids alone. In some cases, it goes a little too far, and that muscular girl ends up being a wiry guy.
Meanwhile, everyone else’s amygdala has lost the ability to cause revulsion, so when they see homosexuality they lack the aversion to it which marks more K-times. The utter disgust of the fifties gives way to a “to each their own” attitude.
At some point we need to start laying the Conservative Policy Mood graph, the Misery Index graph, and this homosexual behavior graph alongside the S&P 500 and see what it all looks like.
[…] As r-selection Increases, So Does Homosexuality […]
I’m actually surprised by the male numbers. I would have expected them to be smaller, since female sexuality has historically been more fluid than female. It seems that a lot of men are being feminized, just like r/K would predict.
At some point you would think that r-selected populations are self-limiting because they reproduce at way below replacement levels. Although in Africa the r-selected migrants reproduce at an alarming rate. Why do their r’s reproduce at a much higher rate than our r’s?
IQ, forward thinking, and access to abortion/birth control. Take birth control and abortion out of the equation and Madonna, and Cher, and Jane Fonda, et al, would each have like thirty kids by the time they are fifty. They wouldn’t want to rear them, and they’d spend as little time doing it as possible in between Bahamas trips, but they’d pass those genes forward.
What will be bad is if we breed a form of r that wants those kids, and will purposely try to make them.
I believe we already have that in Black Welfare America, and in Islam.
What the fuck?
I want to see you lay all those graphs together, do it , do it now