Jill Kelley Says Hillary Won’t Get Indicted

She might be right:

The Florida socialite whose 2012 complaint to the FBI led to the investigation of Gen. David Petraeus’ mishandling of classified information said on Monday that she does not believe that Hillary Clinton will be indicted for mishandling sensitive government information on her private email server.

In an interview with Newsmax TV’s Steve Malzberg, Jill Kelley indicated that she believes Clinton should be indicted but that the Justice Department will never pull the trigger.

“I don’t [think Clinton will be indicted]. You know why? Only because of one thing, the FBI, even though this new director is, I heard, a very good guy, he has bosses, and they’re the same bosses that did this to General Petraeus and my family,” said Kelley, referring to FBI director James Comey.

The bureau is said to be wrapping up its investigation of Clinton’s email server, which she used as secretary of state. More than 2,000 now-classified emails are housed on the server, which is in FBI custody. At least 22 of those emails contain “Top Secret” information…

“I don’t believe anything negative is going to happen to Hillary because the FBI boss, no matter how good his intentions are to bring justice, he still has bosses in our same government that did this to my family,” Kelley told Malzberg.

Poor Kelley. A central figure in a covert op to take out a CIA Director. That had to be unpleasant, to say the least. People just don’t grasp the machinery out there, sitting around with nothing to do.

As for Hillary, Sandy Berger walked out of the National Archives with his pants stuffed with the documents needed to fix the errors which led to 9/11. When he destroyed them, he was damaging the security of the United States in the War on Terror. When he suffered no penalty, it became clear there is no law enforcement at that level, unless it is of practical utility to those who pull the strings.

If Hillary is indicted, we will know she is not in the circle of trust. If she isn’t indicted then she is in the circle of trust. An indictment really won’t mean any more than that. I would think Jarret would want her out, rather than surrender the reins of the machine to the Clintons, so I’d think an indictment is a possibility, but then again, maybe Jarret isn’t actually in charge, and there are deeper players than her who don’t even care who occupies the Presidency.

Also interesting – everybody thinks FBI director Comey is a straight arrow. Yet they also know even he is powerless when the suits upstairs issue orders to lay waste to whatever.

The sight of our nation degenerating before us is painful to look up at, but it must be especially vexing to people who joined the machine with idealistic ideas of battling evil, only to find battling evil is a Faustian bargain in a declining society.

Lets get this collapse on already.

This entry was posted in Conspiracy. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
8 years ago

[…] Jill Kelley Says Hillary Won’t Get Indicted […]

Prof. Woland
Prof. Woland
8 years ago

When we think of a police state, we think of the GESTAPO or NKVD running around arresting and killing political opponents and dissidents. The Obama Administration has twisted that around. Rather then directly persecute people and organizations is does not like, it is simply refusing to prosecute its political allies, many of whom are engaged in attacking the same enemy. The Clinton E-Mail scandal just being the latest example. More examples are:

* Refusal to protect our borders / arrest illegal aliens
* Lois Lehrner – IRS scandal
* Only use hate crime laws against whites
* Use Civil Rights Division of FBI to help BLM types instead of actual victims
* Delayed employer penalties in Obamacare till after election
* Obsession with disparate impact with everything from sub-prime meltdown to hiring
* War on Wymens
* I don’t have time to list more …

Robert What?
Robert What?
8 years ago

Jarret and Obama may hate the Clintons but they have to be seen to protect Hillary. Why? The Clintons have thr goods on Obama: where he was really born, who his biological mother really was, etc. If Hillary goes to the pokey, the Clintons will figure a way to spill the beans on Obama.

Phor
Phor
8 years ago

I doubt very much that Clinton would even get a slap across the wrist, little alone be black balled from her circle of trust.

In my old neck of the woods Officers and Agents that mishandled information like that would only get shit posted, meaning they’re inconvenienced with a temporary road block in their career progression.

It’s a greasy pole, people looking to fight evil don’t climb the greasy pole.