A top presenter on Russian state TV has come out firmly in favour of Donald Trump in his bid to become US president, hailing him as an “anti-establishment” candidate who is ready to co-operate with Moscow. Russian state TV has regularly shown sympathy towards Mr Trump, especially after his apparently complimentary remarks about President Vladimir Putin. But it is only in the last week or so that it has started to unequivocally praise him. Fronting his two-and-half hour news review on official channel Rossiya 1 on 13 March, Dmitri Kiselyov hit out strongly at what he saw as a conspiracy by the US political elite to stymie Mr Trump’s White House ambitions.
K-strategists like each other, even if circumstances pit them against each other. I like Putin, even though I expect he would level America in a heartbeat if it benefitted Russia. Truth be told, I like him even more because of that loyalty to his nation. If only our cuckservatives thought in half as loyal terms.
You can also judge a man by his enemies:
Donald Trump would make “a terrible nominee and a terrible president” — and The Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol said Wednesday that he would rather have Hillary Clinton in the White House than the Republican front-runner.
The establishment does not fully grasp what is building against them. The word anger does not begin to accurately describe it, in large part because that makes it sound as if it is directionless, and could be applied to anything. This is focused hatred and contempt, and it is attached to one type of individual – the modern left-leaning Cuckservative Republican.
More and more, the left has become so detached from reality that I think conservatives have stopped paying attention to them. You get angry at the coworker who takes your food out of the office fridge. But if one day you see that co-worker lying on the sidewalk in a fetal position, mumbling incoherently, you stop paying attention to him. To conservatives, that is what the left has become, so until they pose a direct threat to our safety, and killing them is absolutely necessary for survival, we will ignore them as they celebrate with transgenders, and cop-killers, and pedophiles, and hipsters, and socialist losers.
Cuckservatives however will not be ignored, because they should know better. They will be viewed as betrayers, plain and simple, and now that we have been freed from having to pay attention to the left, they will become the focus of an increasingly angry base, looking for someone to vent on.
Again, this is the effect at .01% Apocalypse. As the Apocalypse revs up, through 50%, and up to the 100% I assume will be coming, that hatred will only grow exponentially. If I was a Cuck, I’d either get on board with the new right, or I would keep my head down. Given the size of the coming Apocalypse, there is no telling how crazy everything would get.
[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]
I think the word you are looking for is “wrath”. A focused anger and rage on a particular person or people. Conservative Treehouse refers to it as “cold anger”, one which is currently being directed towards the constructive ends of electing Trump. Once this outlet is shut off (I’m referring to the establishment/cuckservatives taking the nomination from him, which I believe they will do) it will turn into “hot anger” and violence. We saw a taste of that in Chicago. As you pointed out the best way to avoid that anger is get on board (like Christie, Carson, Palin, and possibly Huckabee) or keep your head down (Limbaugh and Hannity seem to be doing that. Rince Priebus is also taking that tack). I won’t join the angry mob stringing up politicians when it comes to that, but I will watch from afar and chuckle to myself.
Yeah, I agree. I’m not hoisting arms for any of them myself either.
What does this say about a lot of the people I thought were K (and I assume I’m not alone) who are becoming deranged in regards to Trump? This craziness about Michelle Fields has driven people like Ben Shapiro into throwing everything they’ve said in their careers away. He even called Trump a sexist asshat on twitter last night for not liking Megyn Kelly’s reportage. He’s not alone in betraying their supposed principles by saying and acting exactly like the people they’ve built careers off criticizing. Are they K-strategists with loyalties so strong to something other than Trump that they’re willing to go down in flames over it?
We are clannish, and loyal, and that can cloud judgment. If I had known members of the GOPe for decades, was friends with them, got free interviews from them to promote my stuff, enjoyed drinks at parties with them, and so on, I would have a tough time making that first jump to Trump, even knowing how badly the GOPe is screwing everything up. My guess is they have been near ground zero of the GOPe for a long time, and that is the spark which then focuses them on little things like how stalwart Trump is in terms of conservatism, how strictly he adheres to decorum, and so on.
The bottom line is if I had been close friends with say, Rick Perry, I’d have pitched in with him early on, because as a friend I’d have that responsibility, and I’d expect you’d see that and understand, because you’d do the same thing for your best friend.
Relationships complicate things, more for K-strategists than others, and that can focus your mind on different things than the minds of those who are not emotionally invested somehow.
I think this is true. What I have seen, however, is that the mask has not just slipped, it has been ripped off, and the utter contempt, disdain, and hatred that the GOPe and its media wing have for the common people is no different from that on the left. Seeing it once or twice shocked me, but it’s across the board, from the old guard to the new, hip “edgy” contingent like The Shapiros, Loesches and Crowders. While clannishness may account for some of this, it does not account for most of it.
My amygdalae must be the size of grapefruit, because I have felt this coming for a long time, and instead of stress, I now feel relief that the truth has been revealed.
If only the Left could be ignored. If it could be, you wouldn’t be the Anonymous Conservative. For example, right now they are the gatekeepers to too many fields and careers in the US, including all of the STEM ones aside from some fraction of the programming and technical areas, if I was in high school today, I wouldn’t even bother trying to go to college, I’d just start my programming career at home. And speaking of college, what those screaming campus garbage babies that are gatekeeping so many other fields by constraining who can get a college degree, especially one of higher value?
Hey Anonymous Conservative, What do you think of Russia pulling out of Syria. Is it a tactical withdraw, a victory or something else?
I suspect they accomplished what they wanted with the airpower, and now they are moving in the attack helicopters to mop up on the ground.
All they need is Assad in power, and I think Putin is bright enough to realize he will never make the land peaceful, and loyal enough he won’t waste Russian lives trying. I wish we did both gulf wars and Afghanistan the same way.