News Briefs – 10/08/2024

That’s all true, Sam. Thanks. I read Von Mises entire huge “Socialism.” Besides the interesting descriptions of its various types, the only really negative he includes in the whole book is the fact that economic calculation is impossible in a command economy. Begging the question that a non-command economy exists anywhere today outside the Kalahari Desert?
Hey, is Jewish corporate Capitalism really free enterprise? Is a corporation really a “creature of the state?”
.
Your comment that Ryssian serfs were much better off in the USSR than under feudalusm is telling, America today being the most complete and successful form of Marxist Communism ever to exist. Most Americans living under the poverty level are much better off than any Russian Tsar or feudal age pope that ever walked the earth. Right? So don’t gripe, you spoil-sports.
Of course, no matter how well off you is, you is not too well off if’n ye can be drug out an’ shot at sunrise ’cause ye didn’t kow tow to Jesus an’ de fathers ob his church…or if you criticized God’s copilots, or if you axed fo a second hoe-cake fo lunch, eh?
.
On de other han’…
Consider all the wealth that Jews, Inc. have managed to Swindle away over the decades, some ingrate night be unhappy. What? You ingrate would rather be sleepin’ in a hollow log?
.
Some folks are just fine, living in a terrarium, paying de tree hundirt pre sent mortgage. But not everyone. (!)
Seriously, though: a much more satisfactory economy may be run using Tally Sticks than our current travesty. And how could the Reich have gone bankrupt when issuing its own money, based upon the labor of its GERMANIC people…such labor creating all those modern marvels that other nation states were willing to barter for, thus eliminating the middleman? German locomotives for Brazilian coffee for instance?
.
How the heck can you go bankrupt if’n ye throw out de BANK?

Sam, maybe the USSR could have done everything better, I mean why not? But one thing was really holding them back. Rabbi Steven Wise mentioned it at the time. He pointed out that some people called it Communism, but it is really Juadism. TOTAL rule by Jews. With everything that entails. Similar to the America of January 6. But even worse.
.
Re Trinary math, potentially for computers vs. Binary. Please draw a 3×3 grid and fill in the Nine digit roots, 1-9, in the order of the most basic magic square, with rows, columns, and diagonals totalling 15. The Chinese called this the diagram of Lo Shu. Chinese medicine system is based upon this. And 5-Elements Transformations.
AC may thus be familiar with it.
NOW, notice the location of the cells holding 3, 6, and 9. Notice the angles made and the 5 in the center. That triangle is the point of a pentagram. Notice relations to odd and even numbers. Two are odd (3, 9) and one (6) is even. The cells in the magic square may also be colored if you use a paint program. Per the old Taoists, 5 is yellow; 1 and 6 are Black; 4 and 9 are White; 8 and 3 are Blue; 2 and 7 are red.
If you care to use that color layout to fill the cells of the simple multiplication matrix, two visually interesting results may be obtained. First, color the matrix cells according to the number in the one’s column of each cell. You may color all the cells with 0 zero as green or gray. Second version. Color each cell in the matrix per its digit-root, as in 5×6=25 will be red for 7. Etc. Further “fun” = in each matrix cell, surround even digit-roots with squares. Surround odd digit roots with circles. THEN make versions with the “Trinary” numbers 3,6, and 9 with little equilateral triangles.
I used MS Visio to do the above illustrations. I will post a catbox url to my booklet in a few minutes, if I can successfully get it uploaded there.
.
Otherwise, re the Soviet car made from vegetable body parts, Ford and Edison had a famous Hemp fiberglass car body and there was also a 14-foot tall hybrid Goldenrod that exuded a latex rubber, from which they made very suitable tires. Prototypes supposedly now at Ft. Myers. Not exactly what the (((oligarchy))) was insanely happy to see, though! Imagine how family farmers could grow those two *weeds* as a cash crop with no insect pests, on marginal land.
That’s why I am on the “Hail Victory” side.

I use the Sumatra reader sometimes. Especially for portable, though most of the time use the STDU viewer.

Thanks for the papers. They are over my head. My math are not stellar. I got the beginning of differential equations but while I could do the work and understood that you were adding up areas of equations, I don’t think I ever really got the big picture, a deep understanding, and it was a long time ago,

I read a book on Soviet computing. Can’t remember the name. It seems I remember that like binary shifting registers could do fast calculations but that the trinary went farther, faster than binary. Of course, I could be wrong. I kinda, sorta, see this in the excellent paper you posted.

Maybe if I read it over and over, some semblance of a small spark of a neuron will light up, and I will understand it, but I wouldn’t bet money on it. Thanks for posting it.

This second catbox file is to my second booklet that goes into more detail about Trinary Numbers. Both booklets are freely distributed to interested parties, home schoolers. Democrats, etc
A Swastica on the Macic Square of Mars by an American DF at Catbox.moe 10/13/2024
https://files.catbox.moe/1b9q6r.pdf

If asking whether Saul/Paul couldn’t have been lying about his conversion isn’t a legitimate question, then what is?

Based on what evidence? On the side of history, we have the miracles he performed as an apostle, the testimony of the other apostles as to his apostleship, and the fact that he gave his life for his ministry as a martyr.
As I recall your arguments, they are, “nah, I still don’t believe.” Ok, fine, you don’t believe. That isn’t an actual argument, just a position.

This comment alone deserves a Nobel Prize.

But Germany had plenty of space no?

In the first video they mention Goring was in charge of the allocation of resources, which assumedly, likely assuredly, led to the shortage of coal.

I have complained about him before. Goring screwed up a vast amount of things. I submit that he was in a large part a big factor in the loss of the war for Germany. One case specifically, he told Hilter at Stalingrad that he could bring in so many tons of supplies, even though he KNEW, no doubt, that he could not. He delivered, I can’t remember exactly, but it was something like 10% of what he promised. By the time Hitler found out this was happening, it was too late. So all these troops, all these resources were thrown away in Stalingrad. “If” Hitler had known, I strongly suspect he would have retreated and used these resources elsewhere. Like in capturing and getting oil fields up and running. Not to mention if transport was a problem, and it was, then he could have moved resources to change this. In many cases the evidence that Hitler was nuts for not letting people retreat was, I suspect, directly related to lies Goring told Hitler. In Stalingrad, I know this was true. Read David Irvings book “Goering”, He has documented this with statistics and first person interviews.

Unfortunately, Hitler idolized Goring. He was a big hero, but he was not capable and even though his failings were apparent Hitler did not want to dump him.

When Speer took over a lot of Gorings duties, productivity soared. Big time. If Hitler dumped Goring and put Speer in charge earlier, it could have changed a lot.

In the video he says that centralized production can never work BUT,

“…Nevertheless in Speer’s case he was given power to control pretty much the whole industry, and step on toes as needed. The effect was dramatic. War production continued to increase almost until the end of the war, despite things like strategic bombing. Mass production techniques were adopted, petty fiefdoms destroyed, and a centralized approach to planning instituted. Before anyone says that “central planning doesn’t work”, remember that US war production was also centrally planned, under the auspices of the War Production Board. I’m not taking a position on central planning under other circumstances, but for the duration it worked quite well in a number of countries…”

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/28d8c2/how_much_did_albert_speer_really_have_to_do_with/

He also derides the operation of the railroads. How it’s soooo foolish that there were no profits but only enough money charged to pay the workers and keep up the running stock. But as we have seen, over and over, the “privatize” folks always, or all I know of, degrade services while sucking every single penny they possibly can from the public service they take over. This has happened so many times that I well not waste time showing examples. They’re plentiful. Though government control is often not good, it at least beats simultaneous degradation and profit raping of public services. Some things that are monopolies can not be run solely on a capitalistic basis without severe abuse of the customers they have a monopoly over. The key is who profits. If the employees are feather bedding to raise prices, far better them than the financial class scraping off ruinous profits while ignoring service. The glitch on this is you have to have public servants that are competent and diligent. Often not the case. But if it’s the financial class running things, you have no options, if public you at least have the option of political pressure. Both cases, if bad are not good, but you have to make choices for the better of two bads.

Again at the end of this first video he blames everything on central planning yet completely ignores the graphic he puts up on wikipedia that the next sentence shows Speer drastically increasing production(hidden in the notes). So he’s lying. Deliberately skewing the evidence. And he ignores that ALL Allied production was central planning to the max.

I repeat again, he blathers on about free markets, but there is NO free market in a large public utility like railroads.

On his video on the banker, “Why did Hitler hire and fire Schacht “, I can see, very likely, from the way this guy talks he is in favor of the Jews Ludwig von Mises policies. Now the Jews love this guy and plenty of people are taken in by him. Unfortunately, while blathering on and on about private enterprise they conveniently skip over the part where the Jews create money from nothing and charge us debt for doing so, nice business if you can get it. And subsequently through preferential loan creation allows them to take over EVERYTHING. And I assure you they own damn near everything or will because you pay debt fees on any and all money created while they make it from…nothing, nothing at all.

Now I don’t know if this guy is a propagandist or just one of those splerge people who latch onto one idea and ignore everything else. (Like these idiots that latch onto the Jew Moldbug and his stupid ideas that we need a king…please…) Giving him a benefit of doubt, maybe he’s the second. But his total adherence to the Mises approach, Jews own everything, is not so favorable to, the truth. Hitler he says, as if Hitler was some sort of fool, considered the Jews capitalist banking commie disruptors and swindlers. Which they were. It’s a 100% fact that they gained power in Germany by blackmail, swindling, bribery and issuing a veritable fountain of cash from their debt banking financialist machine which they bought up damn near everything. (If you are a US citizen, this might look familiar to you).

He says that Germany boosted the economy by “Keynesian” cash pumping. No. No they didn’t, they did so by refusing to pay the Jews debt to create cash, for nothing, no value to the Germans, like before, and created money solely based on work hours of humans. Which if you think about it is a far more rational yardstick than, give the Jews money and they will let you go onto ruinous debt, while they give you nothing at all and give their Jew buddies wheelbarrows of cash to buy up everything, throw everyone out of work and outsource all production.

His video on MEFO bills runs right off the track at the very beginning by showing a commenters comment who says,”MEFO bills…seems nothing more than creating money out of thin air as central bankers do…”

Well duuuhhh, but notice, there is no debt paid to the central bankers. All the money goes back to the State and the German people. No perpetual debt. This would seem, to me, to be a BIG point, which they seem to have missed. I guess when Jews create money from nothing, well that’s a-ok, but when people decide to do the same for themselves and their people, well that’s a vast evil, or so they say.

I wonder if this Mark Felton is Jewish? He’s done a bit for the BBC which is in itself a bad sign. He’s certainly not a reliable person when it comes to covering ALL the facts.

I just realized I watched some of his other videos and they were even worse. He constantly says when leaders say things, “well they actually meant…this” (critical theory) and yet the leader’s actions are, just what they said. He flubs damn near everything. His own statistics and tables that he shows for evidence, show him wrong. He’s a complete waste of time and nothing but a mind bedoggled dufus. Look where I went through only two of his videos, I couldn’t stand to torment myself with more, and I could easily pick what he said to pieces with 3/4 of my brain tied behind my back. This guy is really awful and no matter what video I see of his it’s always lacking and slanted into some sort of fantastical nonsense. He constantly, and I mean constantly, leaves out very pertinent information and gobbs in some sort of Jew slanted gobberish. He’s really bad.

https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/news-briefs-02-15-2024/#comment-458619

Being a glutton for punishment, I decided to watch this also. As usual, he includes misdirection at the beginning. A commenter noted his “Austrian economics” slant. Let’s call a spade a spade. It’s Jew economics, and it’s fomented by a Jew and hidden by calling it Austrian economics.

So he starts out by unilaterally, with no evidence at all, saying that the “stab in the back” by the Jews was “false” and not the reason the Germans lost the war. He says it was inflation, Hindenburg, blah, blah, blah, but there is no doubt that commie Jews were fomenting workers strikes. That he, with no evidence, says it had no bearing is not true. Maybe it was not the deciding factor but, it was a factor. [Pronouncement technique]

He complains about the, supposed, big dummy Hitler put in a autarky for production for Germany. Meaning no outsourcing and local German production. Excuse me, but after finding supplies in WWI were not available, hindering production, does it not seem a good idea to not depend on supplies you can’t get? I guess I’m just, like Hitler, some big dummy for thinking this might be a problem. Of course, his focus is not on that but, “…it distorted the economy”.

Now excuse me for noticing but after WWI the Jews took over all the banks Churned out a vast, indescribable amount of cash, bought everything and made the Mark so watered down that it took a wheelbarrow full of cash to buy a loaf of bread. But no that was not the problem, it was Hitler’s socialist control of the economy that “…distorted the economy”.

Let’s get one thing straight. Right away. There is no doubt, at all, that while American farmers were hanging themselves in their barns during the depression, Germans were going on company paid vacations. And everyone who wanted to had work. Now, if it pains his sensibilities that it was not the “most efficient” form of economics. You know where the Jews scrap up every single penny into their pockets while Germans die in the streets, well you see his priorities. Before Hitler, veterans were dying of starvation in the streets and children, this is 100%, were prostituting themselves to feed their families. Excuse me for not getting all worked up about the Germans not worshiping “Austrian economics” and letting these useless eaters starve to death in the streets like before.

At least he recognizes that the tax burden was not foisted on the poor. A favorite technique of the Oligarchs.

He has a quote about how many people were disappointed by the Nazis but this quote is by the Jew Mises. Not exactly an unbiased source.

He list this huge, vast, massive benefits the Nazis brought to the working class but then, in a stroke of brilliance [sic], proclaims that the poor were not helped because poor Jews did not do well. Well that settles it doesn’t it. If the Jews don’t do well, then the whole thing is a farce, evil and of no use, according to him.

Look at this quote where he pretends that it’s obviously a horrible thing,

“…By creating unbridled demands for goods everywhere they set foot, citizens of the Reich destroyed the price equilibrium everywhere in Europe…”

DAMN THOSE GERMANS! They had money, and were not living in the streets anymore, and had the audacity to…a moments pause to take it all in….buy THINGS! Damn them. What horror, the peasants were not kept in their proper place prostituting their kids to Jews like good Germans. No they had money, bought things, the horror! It upset the “equilibrium”!

Let’s look at some quotes he has to admit because they are so obvious,

“…12:25
“…although average household income levels were somewhat lower than in peacetime, stable
12:30
prices, a freeze on rents, and an exemption from asset seizure made it possible to live
12:36
in material comfort. If one factors into the equation soldiers’ wages and their food
12:42…”

But of course this is all a failure because they “upset the equilibrium” and poor Jews weren’t happy.

This guy is a never ending persistent magician of distraction. He complains about shortages of consumer goods. Well duhhhh, they were in a war. In the US you couldn’t buy a car, tires, a long line of things that were rationed and England was even worse. In fact, the English kept up rationing after WWII for many years so they could pay the Jews off for extravagant loans taken out during wartime that the Jews created, from nothing. How convenient he doesn’t mention that but constantly blathers on about the poor Germans, who he had to admit had never done better and certainly were better off than when the Jews ran things. And it’s impossible to account for rationing and lack of supplies when everyone knows the Germans were absolute shit for economic resources. No oil, no land, lack of farm land, lack of everything but the Germans people who are an industrious bunch.

This guy is all over the place. In another video he complains about the German railroads being packed causing delays. YET is this not maximum efficiency of the rail lines ???(maximum efficiency is another thing Austrian economist worship) Is it not maximum usage and “efficient”. So in one case it’s inefficient and another it’s not. He is… full of shit.

Now to clarify, I am not at all in favor of any dictatorship, commie government or Oligarchy. They all have the deficit that over time psychopaths and/or the most ruthless will filter to the top, (sound familiar to US citizens or anyone in the West?), but there is such a thing as comparative analysis. And his constant ignoring of what happened in the past and how things are ordered now is a blind spot as big as the Pacific Ocean.

His economics is like the physics professor who in describing a cow simplifies it to, “Now consider a round cow”. It’s absurd. He also pretends that Germany was in some normal situation when they were fighting a world war and completely doesn’t even begin to note that all the belligerents were doing the exact same thing. Rationing, command economy, on and on, but of course the poor Jews were not happy, so damn the Germans.

This guy is very likely a Jew. I can’t find the answer to that because about three years ago Jews started washing their backgrounds. Nevertheless, he has all the qualities of them. Frequent “pronouncement” techniques where he just says this is this while providing nothing to back it up and ignoring a vast amount of data that completely negates his arguments. Listening to him is like watching TV, and we all know how painful that is. He’s not quite as bad as the “Miles Mathis Committee” but, he’s pretty bad. Listening to him for your brain is like eating feces contaminated food for your stomach.

“…The shortages and other problems started years before the war….”

This is EXACTLY what I’m talking about. It’s like proclaiming it smells in the house while ignoring a herd of cattle emplaced in the house. Blindly wondering why it smells so bad.

No shit, they had rationing. The reparations, surely you know about these, were crushing the Germans.

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/1004/Germany-finishes-paying-WWI-reparations-ending-century-of-guilt

They only finished paying these in 2010 they were so large. Damn near the whole budget went to it. And let’s not mention France siphoned off the largest industrial area of the country and was hauling off all their coal and other resources. And the response to this is, the Germans were stupid socialist. The Germans are big dummies who didn’t know anything.

And here’s another, the English WON the war, supposedly, and had rationing that did not end until 1954. Almost a decade after the war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_Kingdom

Combine this with the financial rape of the country by the Jews and, BIG PROBLEM.

Now you say I’m wrong yet where??? No, I’m not wrong. If you people notice I can be quite forceful in defending my positions BUT what you haven’t noticed, I don’t believe, is that when I find I’m wrong I humbly admit it. Usually it’s from some sort of data I was not aware of before. It’s no shame to admit you’re wrong if the information you have changes.

When I write stuff where I say something, I usually already know. I’m fairly sure I’m right before I even comment. Usually the way this goes is someone brings up a lot of silly stuff, like the German rationing while ignoring vast amounts of data, like reparations, loss of territory, Jewish parasitism, everyone else rationing also, blackmailed political parties, and as I point this out more silly stuff is brought up until I crush most all of these wrong objections, then they say well “I don’t want to cover this anymore”, or “I don’t want to waste time”, etc. etc. anything but notice I was right from the beginning.

That video guy is a horrible, lying, distorting “supposed” Historian who couldn’t “history” his way out of a paper bag. Watching his stuff poisons the mind. Every single thing I’ve seen of his is a lying, slanted, dishonest piece of propaganda. He’s like those assholes in Israel who blather on and on about Hamas while neglecting to tell you that a very large proportion of the Israelis killed that day were by the Israeli’s themselves with gun ships and by blasting down houses with Israelis in them(half or more????). And neglecting to mention that it took them 7 hours to do anything, when you could drive from the very top north of Israel to Gaza in the South in 2 and a half hours. A gunship could make it in 1-1/2 hour, and it’s not like ALL of them are all the way in the far North. According to a Israeli soldier who served in Gaza, it takes…5 minutes. So they killed their people on purpose. Now it’s bad that Hamas killed Israelis but it’s worse when your own government does you in on purpose.

“…but he is 100% right that National Socialism was socialist and ruined the German economy in different ways…”

This is not correct. What he is doing is coming to an assumption “all socialism is bad and especially “National Socialism is bad” and then ignoring anything that does not prove him right, only showing you things that are not going well even if national socialism has nothing to do with it. So either he hates all government control in the economy(he wants all control in the Jews hands it appears to me) or he hates national socialism and fascism and cheats to makes these look unsuccessful.

I submit that raw 100% capitalism never last because the capitalist soon move into being Oligarchs and monopolist. There is no capitalism, in many, a vast number, of public services. It’s just not possible. And as I’ve said, better to have a little government over spending, that you can at least complain about, than have private actors that you have zero, no, nada, recourse no matter how hard they rape you financially.

And on the subject there are direct, indisputable economies that prove him wrong. Very wrong. The Nazis #1, It’s totally indisputable that they greatly increased the welfare of the German people as a whole. Indisputable. Japan is nothing but one big ass socialist fascist country and their economy grew at huge substantial rates for many decades. They are not poor and there is not a vast number of people living on the streets. Now they have NO resources and their population is cratering, so they will never have the standard of living they could if they had more resources, but they are hardly poverty stricken. China is exactly the same. One big ass fascist country with lots of socialism. Once again they do not have the resources, but they are doing WAY BETTER than they were under, Emperors, Warlords, Capitalist and other assorted fiends under the system they have now.

To ignore the huge gains made by national socialist countries, Germany, Japan, China and only point out any and all failing they have, this is nothing but pure rotten distortion of the truth. It’s damn hard to ignore all these countries, unless you are a dissembler of false truths.

Now you might be saying, “Sam J. is some sort of Nazi national socialist”, no, I’m not…but, I see people, Americans, living in cardboard boxes, vans and tents while we send hundreds of billions to Ukraine and Israel and I say, let’s get these people off the sidewalk FIRST, then we can see about sending money to Ukraine and Israel to exterminate people. But only after we take care of our own first. And I don’t care if they are drunkards, drug addicts or whatever, we take care of our own first. And if that’s socialism, then I’m for it.

If we are going to have rationing, then let’s start at the top first. The people at the top live under different rules than us, I want them the same.

If you go to the recent comments tab you can be updated on recent comments on even old posts.