K-Strategists Want To Shoot Back

We have seen how free resources have corrupted our leaders:

Populations of the Western nations who can now see the weak faces of their leaders without the masks– the terrorists can clearly see them too…

But it is what most of the leaders did after the “Je suis Charlie Hebdo” rally that defines them for what they really are: cowardly and MIA in their abysmal failure to deal with the continuing spread of radical Islamic terrorism.

In fact, the western leaders rolled over to play dead to terrorism, allowing their countries to be overwhelmed by hundreds of thousands of “refugees”, some of whom are terrorists—including two of the terrorists killed in Friday night’s strike on Paris who registered in Greece as “refugees”.

Terrorists are on the rampage because they are being let in to overwhelm the sovereignty of Europe, America, Canada and other nations—and primarily because the rampaging kill-crazy terrorists recognize that there is a lack of political will among Western leaders to stand up and stop them.

All weak rabbits who want to run or appease rather than fight.

This is not true of K-strategists on the right, who feel right at home in the battle. It is no coincidence that the last French train shooting came to an early end when two US military men happened on the scene. Here in politics, Marie LePen taps into that K-strategist urge to battle with anyone who challenges our people:

If there is one ‘winner’ from last night’s terrible events in Paris, it is France’s anti-EU, anti-immigration far-right wing Front Nationale party leader Marine Le Pen. Having already ascended to the lead in yet another poll ahead of France’s 2017 elections, Le Pen came out swinging this morning call for France to “re-arm itself,” stating that radical Islam must be “eradicated” from France. She further demanded that border controls be made “permanent” and binational Islamists must be deprived of their French passport.

Trump thinks the same way:

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said on Saturday that the terror attacks in Paris would have been ‘a much, much different situation’ had the victims been armed with guns.

Only a warrior would think that way. I would have given a testicle to put any shooter there with a compensated Rock River Arms LAR-PDS in .300 Blackout and EOTech Holosight under a long jacket. The single thing which breaks my heart the most is hearing how the terrorists ordered everyone to lay down, everyone laid down, and then everyone laid motionless as terrorists went from person to person killing them in the theater – even the women. What the terrorists got, and what they deserved, are just too far removed. Of course what they deserved is nothing compared to what Western leaders who facilitated this deserve.

Unfortunately, as the K-strategist instinctually in-groups, he will leave his rear flank open to the r-strategists in his population, who, having no in-grouping instinct, view him as more of an enemy to be defeated than the foreigners who are killing people:

Germany’s interior minister on Saturday made a plea against linking the terror attacks in Paris to the record influx of asylum seekers into Europe.

“I would like to make this urgent plea to avoid drawing such swift links to the situation surrounding refugees,” Thomas de Maiziere said, noting that there have already been “appalling scales of attacks against asylum seekers and asylum seeker shelters”.

Besides beefing up police presence and border controls, the minister said after a crisis cabinet meeting that security forces will also keep a close watch on far-right extremists.

Notice, political conservatives, who would protect their own people by keeping the enemy outside the gates, are seen by the rabbit as being as much of an enemy as the guys with AK’s, grenades, and suicide vests who are killing people. Who does the rabbit send after the loyal domestic K-strategist? Other loyal domestic K-strategists. From an evolutionary standpoint, K-strategists are as much of a reproductive threat as the terrorist, because they are superior in every way – morally, intellectually, competitively. In an honest world where free competition determines outcomes, no woman wants Woody Allen when she could be with Bruce Willis.

Rabbits want to kill K-strategists, be they cops, soldiers, firefighters, or just patriotic citizens who love their own nation. If they can pit them all against each other, all the better. Never let them tell you otherwise.

The one problem with this blog is that r/K can become repetitive. Yet there is no other way to reinforce the idea of politics as reproductive strategy, other than to show that everywhere you look, the rabbits are designed to graze endless fields of grass, and the wolves are designed to come out and battle as the resources grow short.

Now lets get out the guns, Europe, and get ready to start killing terrorists. It is K-selection time, or as I like to call it, the warm-up to the Apocalypse that is coming.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
9 years ago

[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
9 years ago

I think you meant “suppressor” rather than “compensator.” The 300 BLK would be most useful in that situation if suppressed, running subsonic ammo, allowing the opportunity to shoot each terrorist without the others realizing it.

Another possibility would be to carry (dream-land) a Kel-Tec Sub-2000 carbine. It folds into a backpack sized 16 inches, can certainly shoot subsonic ammo (9mm 147gr JHP’s, for example), and the new version comes threaded for suppressors.

Hollywood and Interweb combatants to the contrary, the AK47’s round is not really very destructive, and in FMJ loadings is no more (and possibly less) destructive than a 9mm FMJ.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a233190.pdf
The Sub-2000 would actually give a defender all the firepower needed for short-range (5-50 yds) engagements.

Roy
Roy
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
9 years ago

In war the winners get to write History. In politics the winners get to write, amend, interpret, repeal, enforce, selectively enforce and ignore the “Laws”. Read Chapter 10 of Hayek’s “The Road to Serfdom”,” Why the Worst Get to the Top” and write the “Laws”, connect the dots. Hayek defines the problem as the belief in egalitarianism.

The only totally egalitarian entity is Mother Nature’s Laws such as the Law of Gravity, Thermodynamics etc. They cannot be contorted as can Man’s Laws.

Dave, please define all acronyms the first time you use them.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
Reply to  Anonymous Conservative
9 years ago

Too true. There was a guy who used a Ruger select-fire AC556 to defend against a clear-cut case of assault with intent and the simple presence of the NFA weapon turned what should have been a garden-variety self-defense shoot into a drawn-out personal nightmare.
http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?t=198964

Bottom line: there is a clear benefit to sticking with firearms that do not evoke Hollywood-inspired “bad guy” associations in (idiot) prosecutors and (idiocracy) juries.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
9 years ago

More on bullets & wounding.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a183285.pdf

It may be slightly off topic, but given the persistence of misinformation on this subject, it might be useful. The bottom line is that when choosing a rifle/ammo combination, it really doesn’t matter whether it’s a 5.56×45 NATO, a 7.62×39 Russian short, a 7.62×51 NATO (308 Winchester), or something more exotic (e.g., the 6.8 SPC), only bullets that deliver both penetration and expansion/fragmentation offer much utility.

This is why, although one can accumulate a large armory of inexpensive FMJ ammo for one’s favorite modern sporting rifle, using that in a fight throws away half of the utility of the rifle. All quality battle-worthy ammo for modern sporting rifles costs about a dollar each.

Good ammunition isn’t available on the cheap.

http://dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf
Time for a Change (which suggests that either better bullets or a switch to something like the 6.8 SPC is merited.)

Fred
9 years ago

I sort of thought that’s what all these immigrants were for, to kill the Ks.

Nathan
Nathan
9 years ago

It can get repetitive, but it’s still good to see examples in the wild. I just finished a multiplayer strategy game where one of my allies literally would rather kill me and cause the team to lose. His justification was that I didn’t help him earlier when I had judged him to be not in danger. The actions of rabbits in real life as as incomprehensible as the actions of that one player would rather lose than see me win.

Nathan
Nathan
Reply to  Nathan
9 years ago

And the next guy who experienced something similar helped me out and was glad for the help I eventually did provide. It just shows people have completely different reactions to the same situations. Not all people are the same!

jobethian09
9 years ago

“The one problem with this blog is that r/K can become repetitive. Yet there is no other way to reinforce the idea of politics as reproductive strategy, other than to show that everywhere you look, the rabbits are designed to graze endless fields of grass, and the wolves are designed to come out and battle as the resources grow short.”

Never grow weary of repeating and reinforcing this idea. It’s so critical. And I never grow weary of hearing you explain and illustrate it. It’s both illuminating and entertaining. Thanks for all your work!

infowarrior1
infowarrior1
9 years ago

Its weird that I have the same reaction as Trump. Even if I myself cant fight for shit currently.

Koanic
9 years ago

It is repetitive, and effective rhetoric is repetitive. The liberal must either deny the biological reality or r/K, or deny its broad applicability. The book demolishes the former and the blog the latter.

JAQUE BAUER
JAQUE BAUER
9 years ago

I never understood captives who complied like sheep knowing they were going to be killed. If they only rioted and charged their attackers some might get the chance to grab a weapon and take the bad guys down. But to sit quietly as you are about to have your head chopped off is really stupid….fight and fight and thrash about. Its no wonder the bad guys are winning when the population are little more than weak compliant sheep.