Is The Desire To Emulate The Successful The Ultimate Societal Weakness?

Pitcrew had a comment about Martha Stewart’s takedown which is still reverberating in my head:

Martha Stewart’s media success, Martha Stewart Living, was a huge deal in the 1990’s. I would suspect that the Cabal took her down because her show was going to teach a generation of Millennial girls how to be domestic and be good housewives. If this show was big when 9/11 and the Oil Wars of the 2000’s were getting ready to start it would have helped the nation go hard K. Imagine if all those millennials that are scraping by and childless now, had families- It would be like the Eisenhower era right now. There would literally be millions more white children in America today and the Cabal’s plans for the coming decades would be weakened.

Instead of the Oil Wars expanding (from Iraq and Libya to Iran/Venezuela) they ceased because of Fracking and the 2008 recession.

Maybe Heartiste can comment on this, but “liberated” women- signalled to and directed towards r-selection will make men go in that direction too. Think about it this way- if all the women are sleeping around and a guy can get laid pretty easy then why settle down? Why would you marry a slut? On the other hand, if a woman is very domestic in her early 20’s it can have a civilizing effect on a man and that’s a major way families start.

Instead of homemaking becoming a “thing” with Millennial women, the fad instead became dressing like a slut- then acting like and becoming a slut. I distinctly remember the way young women dressed in 2000 and the way they dressed in 2010. The difference was amazing. The Cabal shut down Martha Stewart Living because it didn’t want an entire generation of girls to act like their older sisters and mothers. The Cabal wanted do destroy them with feminism instead.

As that was bouncing around, I stumbled on this story:

“Sex and the City” premiered on HBO 20 years ago this week, imprinting on a generation of women a love of fantastic fashion and dreams of their own Mr. Big. Among them was Julia Allison, who moved to New York in the early 2000s to live the Carrie Bradshaw lifestyle. She became a dating columnist, a party fixture and one of the first Internet celebrities — thanks to Gawker, the site that loved to hate on her. But her pursuits sent her, ultimately, down a path of unhappiness and unfulfillment. Looking back on how the show’s ideals negatively impacted her life, Allison, now 37, tells Doree Lewak: “If I could go back and do it all over again, I wouldn’t…”

I grew up a nerd in Chicago, more likely to duck into the library than talk to other kids at recess. At 12, I thought I would never be kissed. (Boy, did I make up for that later.)

I was a rising high-school senior when “Sex and the City” debuted in 1998, and I was instantly enthralled. I wanted to be like Carrie and her friends: I wanted to be glamorous and beautiful and dress well and have lots of dates. I realized I didn’t have to be a geek anymore. I could reinvent myself.

The show was my road map. Of all the die-hard fans I knew, I was the most influenced by “SATC.” At Georgetown University, where I enrolled in 1999, I started to wear dresses and learned how to do my makeup and curl my hair. The newfound male attention I received felt exhilarating.

I even started a dating column for my college paper called “Sex on the Hilltop,” which was modeled after Carrie’s column in the fictional New York Star.

I also subscribed to Carrie’s ethos when it came to men. There was no such thing as a bad date — only a good date or a good brunch story. In my writing, I gave my boyfriends nicknames (one was “Prom King”) just like Carrie and her friends did…

I do wonder what my life would have looked like if “Sex and the City” had never come across my consciousness. Perhaps I’d be married with children now? Who knows, but I can say for sure that, as clever and aesthetically pleasing as the show was — and, as much as I agree with its value of female friendships — it showed too much consumerism and fear of intimacy disguised as empowerment.

It’s like candy: in the moment it feels good to eat it but, afterward, you feel sick. Who you’re dating, what you’re wearing, or how good you look at that premiere — none of that s?-?-?t matters unless you genuinely love yourself. Solid relationships are what really matter.

Truth be told, I wish I had never heard of “SATC.” I’m sure there are worse role models but, for me, it did permanent and measurable damage to my psyche that I’m still cleaning up.

Look at what that show did to this girl’s behavior.

Of course, in the sidebar of that article was a link to this one:

You may be surprised to know that “cuckold porn” was the second most searched porn term after “youth,” according to the authors of the book “A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the Internet Tells Us About Sexual Relationships.” While wife sharing may be a commonly held fantasy, in reality, it’s a sexual scenario that is a step too far for most men.

Not for so-called Stags though. These guys get their rocks off watching their wife or girlfriend having sex with other dudes. The Stag either joins in or watches as a voyeur. The Vixen, or, as they are known in some circles, Hotwife, has sex with the encouragement of her husband or boyfriend with the Bull (that’s the guy who is servicing her).

Another scenario is that the Vixen has sex with a Bull outside of the couple’s shared abode, then comes home and recounts all the details in a blow-by-blow description to turn the Stag on…

In political circles, [cuck]’s a barb that the alt-right throw at lefty men as in, “You snowflake cuck,” before the left cluck back and call them “Cuckservatives.” These insults allude to the fact that in some cuckhold scenarios there’s an element of ritualized humiliation, submissiveness, jealousy, or denial that comes into play.

So it is a fun healthy experience for a wife to go out and bring back a man to service her in front of her husband, or to cheat, and then recount all the details. That is the best way to break up a marriage. But here we are told it is normal and healthy.

To give you a level of understanding for how much such articles are disinformation, notice it references the political term Cuckservative as an insult dreamed up by the left, to throw at the alt-right and humiliate them over their jealousy and insecurity. The author is not that ignorant. That article is planned disinformation, organized from the top – the same top which took out Martha Stewart.

It reminds me of one anon’s post on 4Chan a while back. He claimed that decades ago he worked for a small group of psychiatrists who were hired by a three letter agency to do research into how media alters behavioral programming. He claimed their research showed that vicariously presented visual storytelling was integrated into the brain in a subconscious fashion. It would begin with the brain scanning for high status, successful, and happy individuals. The brain would then input their behaviors and mannerisms into the mind subconsciously, and then begin unconsciously replicating them as part of an evolutionarily imbued mechanism designed to guide you to success through unconscious mimicry. He said this didn’t happen consciously, but rather the brain automatically made one behave (and even think) like those they saw who presented as high status, without any realization there was any sort of mimicry going on. He said the brains were actually reprogramming themselves automatically, beneath the conscious level.

He said the agency dismissed their work, at least to them, and then disbanded their group as a failure.

But he and his cohorts talked decades later and realized the information was being put to use to create media that was designed to make the masses begin behaving in state-friendly ways, weaken their positions in life, and accept greater levels of control. Presumably this weakening of the masses allowed the state greater power to step into the lives of select individuals, and elevate them to positions of power, so the machine doing this could have more complete control of society through their specifically selected proxies.

I see that happening here. They fed this girl the image of a phenomenally successful woman who was on top of the world in Sex and the City, and she absorbed the image, became obsessed by it, and then emulated it without thinking. She moved to the city, sought to write a column, and began banging every guy she could, as often as she could. She even began reiterating the same prepackaged, easily memorable rationales that were inserted into the show to aid the programming. “There is no such thing as a bad date — only a good date or a good brunch story.”

In the process, she began being promoted up the media hierarchy, and getting all sorts of free press, advancing her column which promoted the exact same lifestyle. She even thought for a while she was successful, even though it was all running contrary to her instincts, and true happiness was eluding her.

Meanwhile Martha Stewart was there, promoting the idea of building a home and being domestic so as to please your family, and suddenly she was taken down, possibly by a first-rate intelligence operation. That, combined with the image of her in a prison jumpsuit, and the tell-all biographies, and Cybil Shepard portraying her as a bitter loser in the miniseries, would both destroy her countermanding cognitive input of a successful and happy domestic as the ideal of happiness, and replace it with an image of her domestic path as leading to prison and unhappiness.

It is an amazingly well-designed system if you look at it honestly.

And as you try to divine a purpose, you realize that destroying the family is just like killing the shuttle program to cut us off from space, destroying domestic steel production, feeding tainted Asian steel into our military, giving our sensitive military tech to the Chinese, moving our manufacturing base over to China, taking away our most effective guns, and keeping Donald Trump out of office. It was all designed to destroy American greatness and make us weak enough to be defeated.

Somebody was plotting the downfall of America. They just never counted on America, or the people it produces like Donald Trump.

Tell everyone about r/K Theory, because all of the media is designed to manipulate you – into not being an American