Nowhere is free from prying eyes these days:
The level of control over emails, landlines and even on some categories of mobile phones in the Vatican is reaching levels “that would be envied even by North Korea” according to Marco Tosatti.
It is no surprise a leftist Pope would try to assert total control over everyone, to assuage his amygdala triggering, by hiring spies to watch everyone. If he is doing that, he is doing more than just monitoring phones and emails of those specific people who he has identified as opposing him. My guess is every moment of their day is being cataloged by a motley crew of techs monitoring technology, followers, and infiltrators.
The problem is surveillance was the only way to combat the terrorist threat in the homeland following 9/11. It did an impressive job. I assumed after 9/11 that every week we would have a bus in some major city opened up like a can of sardines by a suicide bomber. Yet after 9/11, the attack matrix has been shockingly sparse.
So surveillance techniques, technologies, and the machinery grew strong, because they were effective.
Unfortunately, where leftists stumble upon it, they avail themselves of it freely because it is an immense power. It is the free resources of political battles, because you do it, gain all the advantage, and suffer no detriment. Where leftists meet the possibility of exploiting surveillance, they cannot help themselves, as the Trump Wiretapping Scandal shows. It is even a rush. I imagine Strzok felt immensely powerful listening to Trump’s phone calls, reading his emails, and arranging what he thought was the outcome of Trump’s candidacy. Look at how worried he was Trump might win. Performing his operations alleviated that stress.
Here, the Pope cannot stop himself, because the power he gets from this is immediate and absolute. It renders his opposition helpless to stop him without any negative consequences arising, and that is catnip to rabbits.
Conservatives are different. With amygdalae that are almost designed to eschew free resources and easy wins in favor of drawn out, honestly arduous competitions, conservatives will purposely not abuse such a power when presented with it. Just as James Kalstrom says the FBI agents who spied on Trump should be in Leavenworth for using the machinery to attack the right, if given the power to use it to attack the left, he would never turn it around and partisanize the agency for the right. It just isn’t in a conservative’s nature.
This FBI scandal could be the cataclysm in domestic intel that will take everything down. If so, and intel rebuilds itself after behind the scenes, these organizations will never let another leftist attain a position of power to issue them orders ever again.
Not because they want to help conservatism, but merely because they will see that to let leftists give them orders will mean death to all that they have worked to build and their mission.
Is he even the true Pope though? I suspect Obama tipped the scales in the Cardinals conclave in 2013.
It would not surprise me to find he is possessed, or at least has a deal going with the Dark Prince.
A Catholic friend half-jokingly claims that the Holy Spirit will occasionally “possess” Francis and force him to say, or not say, certain things, just to keep him from crossing the line and formally desecrating his office. Sort of like “entering the Avatar state” in Avatar: The Last Airbender.
“never let another leftist attain a position of power”
That seems overly optimistic. 😉
Israel and treasonous establishment rats were behind 9/11. Check out Bollyn.com or zioncrimefactory for the truth. AC I enjoy your work but it seems to me you like to deflect away from the real enemy. Why is that?
I call it like I see it, and am always open to anything. But right now, with what I see, non-Jewish rabbits are a bigger problem than guys like Sheldon Adelson who support Trump. I think Jew/non-Jew is a bad divider when we have r/K to separate out all the left, Jew and non-Jew alike.
As for 9/11, I’ll look at the evidence you cite. My impression is in the US, the US Intel/surveillance hierarchy is king, and would not let Israel play on their turf. I think somebody in US intel probably stumbled on the 9/11 hijackers before the day of attack, and I think whoever they were they either didn’t pass it on, or it was passed up the chain of command and never came back down. I just think everything is too penetrated for nobody to have ever happened across those guys, given all they were up to. Maybe it was a case of being non-operational intelligence, maybe somebody at the top saw power coming, maybe it fit another agenda and was piggybacked, I have no idea.
Someone did put a report out on 10th September 2001 about Mossad calling them “a wild card. Able to make operations look like the work of Arabs” very interesting timing for this don’t you think?
Could be but I never saw the report.
Clearly it would have been in Israel’s interest to see America recognize the Muslim threat. And I know Israeli’s may have known, and were filming when the planes hit. Again, I think it was highly likely someone in American Intel knew, and it would not surprise me if the Israeli’s knew.
But Israel doing it as a full fledged false flag op on American soil seems unlikely. I have a rough idea of domestic intel capabilities here, and I will bet Israel does as well. Pulling something like that off, without American Intel finding out would be very difficult, and even if Israel felt it could pull strings to cover it up, you never know when a retired US Marine in US intel decides he is going to unilaterally take down the op in spite of his superior’s determination it was not relevant to his operations. In America, wild cards are everywhere.
If that got uncovered, it could spiral out of control fast. It would be too high risk, IMO.