Actual article on BBC’s Pidgin Site:
One woman for India don get permission from court to divorce her husband because im no gree build toilet for dem house.
The woman wey dey for her 20’s don dey married to her husband for five years, but na for inside bush she dey poopoo…
The lawyer for di woman tell AFP news agency say the judge say to dey make di woman poopoo for outside na one form of torture…
To piss and poopoo for open field dey common for villages for India. The government don set target to give every house toilet by 2019, but dat work never really get head.
This is actually as smart a solution as I could see, given the predicament of operating in an SJW-converged organization. Picture it.
You work in BBC. You can’t not hire the 3rd world African immigrant retards, because that would be discriminatory. So you hire one, and next thing you know they submit this article about “womenz ‘n dar pisses en poopies win India,” which to them is high intellectual fare. What do you do? You can’t ignore it, that would be discriminatory. You can’t correct it, that would be a gross assertion of white/intellectual privilege. You can’t not print it, because that would be discriminatory and rude.
So you have two options. You either print it on the regular BBC site as is, turning your bread and butter site into a laughing stock, or you come up with a great idea for a new subset of the BBC, devoted to “pidgin,” a “language” without grammar or spelling which changes every day, and stick it there.
Now you have a 2nd site specifically marketed to the imbeciles who can’t understand English, and you have not tainted your main site, either.
Spread r/K Theory, cuz m idjits ‘n ‘tards ‘nt gon kill ‘mselves
Could you explain the “We Wuz Kangs” phenomenon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPLP8B5G3-I
They think that white people stole civilization from them or something.
As I go through life, I have noticed that people often believe what assuages their amygdala. I have seen it so often that now I frequently find myself wondering if I am accurately calculating reality dispassionately, or if my amygdala is tricking my brain, and contaminating truth with feel good.
I believe we will see the collapse, I think the numbers fit, but I am haunted by how good the machine is at pushing things down the line whenever collapse closes in. In that area, I am often wondering, could the collapse be pushed off, and my analysis of collapse dates for entitlements and national debts might be off by a hundred years? I hate to think of the flood of migrants who have no respect for freedom and autonomy, the advance of a security state that will eventually be hijacked by a nefarious actor, and the potential for a tyrant to take over as amygdalae wane over a century. I hate to think of dying and not knowing things were great when I cashed out.
SO PROGRESSIVE! SO BRAVE! POWERFUL!
Oh man, I’m pissing myself laughing at this crap.
>cuz m idjits ‘n ‘tards ‘nt gon kill ‘mselves
Given the number of pictures I’ve seen recently of Antifa groups carrying around rifles they’ve never actually trained with, with their fingers inside the trigger guard, waving them around like they’re chic accessories, and accusing anyone with a particular haircut of being a Nazi, I’m going to have to disagree with you on that point.
But seriously, I have noticed that in all the pictures I’ve seen of Antifa with guns, they give off a strong “I’ve never practiced or trained for combat in my life” vibe. It’s like they think a gun is some kind of magic totem that grants them badass fighting ability, regardless of their lack of training or support equipment (most of them look like they only have one magazine on them — the one currently loaded). Is this virtue signalling taken to its (il-)logical conclusion?
Then there’s the fact that, according to their Twitter profiles, they only just got into guns right now after Trump was elected. I even saw one guy saying they shouldn’t get guns now — rather, they should wait until “it goes down,” at which point, and I shit you not, this is what he said: “guns will be everywhere, and we can just pick them up and use them.”
I get the feeling Antifa isn’t going to be the most competent in actual fighting. I still consider them a threat, in the same way I would consider an idiot at a gun range with no concept of safety a threat, but I don’t see the bulk of them as being any kind of fighting force. Maybe they’ve got a few wacked-out anarchists in their ranks that actually take things seriously, but the rank-and-file Antifa member seems more dangerous to his “comrades” than to his enemies from my perspective.
Holy crap. I really did think I’d seen it all (or anticipated what was coming). This is beyond belief.
Good find AC, instant comedy gold.
maybe, however, it’s likely that the British Government wants to influence the locals in that resource rich part of Nigeria/Africa, stir up separatist sentiment or at least stoke unrest, remember the US has established large numbers of so-called lily pad bases, having the BBC under the cover of Political Correctness establish a propaganda outlet aimed at the resources is quite ingenious!
The r/K theory cannot be applied to a specific part of a species. It’s an observation on a species as a whole.
Technically, what r/K describes is a pair of psychologies designed for either free resource availability, or resource shortage, and the traits those psychologies drive.
If you have a species which experiences both environments intermittently, or experiences one in one area, and the other in another area, it would be unbelievable if it did not adapt to express both psychologies, to some degree, as a way to adapt more completely to the differing environments it faces.
Before facebook wiped its likes to zero, r/K as politics had about 50,000 likes, and it has almost ten thousand more now, and I suspect there was another wipe in between now and then. And that is just facebook. By my estimation r/K has at least 200,000 – 400,000 people who have seen it, gotten the idea, and are periodically spreading it, so it will eventually catch on everywhere.
LOL you are right, as I’ve been sharing it. Nice observation AC.
AnonCon, you big man gotta sensa Yuma all day, you bet.
I could not read this. Seriously do they not have an editor
Hey Anonymous what do you think of this show Naked Attraction dating show? From England.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4650158/Channel-4-s-Naked-Attraction-causes-controversy.html
Smart play in times of peak r. The only thing which determines success in r is uniqueness. That kind of publicity will get everyone talking about it and have that show’s ratings off the charts, and that will allow them to charge through the nose for advertising. And products which advertise on it will probably sell through the roof because in r quality means nothing compared to publicity.
Truth be told if I could organize a contest where alt-right figures would get on a stage naked and let themselves be judged, Evopsych would be at the top of every best seller list overnight. I almost feel stupid that I understand this need to attention whore to succeed and yet I am not doing it.
Publicity can help and sexual one are great way to get the left to look and right to write about. I think you have one piece of the puzzle but it works both ways.
Remember the media did not expect that their reporting of Donald Trump would back fire (he wants to send back Mexicans ect). When I was growing up and the media kept going displaying their horror and on the violence in Grand Theft Auto 3 (before that Heavy Metal) and warning parents. You know what happen? It became one of the greatest selling game of all time. Another one to think about is Gamergate.
GTA 5 was band in Target in Australia for sexism and so some men brought extra copies and boycotted Target for reasons. I think your site and books you could work it both ways. Yes sex can sell but you know what sexism (from the left view) can also sell.
Get some known Left wing media source like the Young Turks or CNN to go on how bad your book is (racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, ect) and how parents should protect their young children from this harmful thing and just wait for people to want to buy the forbid books. Or get a fox news, Alex Jones or Steven Crowder to go on about how bad the book is (poor source, not good for children, anti christian ect). It can also work on the positive thing such as a recommendation from Bill Whittle or Stefan Molyneux (how I found out of your work and jim penman both great reads). Best recommendation if you can get it would be in my opinion Vox Day.
Interesting. If I had slanted the idea to be more racist or sexist, it might have spread faster through hate. Now that is someone who understands the system. You are right.
Vox is actually ambivalent or skeptical of evolution, so Vox is doubtful on the theory. I obviously disagree, and feel this is more my area, but se la vie.
I might have a strategy to exploit the system a little better. My real advantage is when I set an objective like this, I do not quit. I will find the path. I just need to work a bunch of paths that spread it slowly, until I find the one that works.