The Rabbits Of CNN Rethink Monogamy

Notice how the last thing which crosses their mind is how to best rear offspring:

Could opening your relationship to others benefit you and your partner?

For many couples, monogamy — staying sexually exclusive with one partner — is expected and assumed. It’s even included in many marriage vows. But as some people are increasingly realizing, monogamy isn’t for everyone.

In fact, consensual non-monogamy can be a healthy option for some couples and, executed thoughtfully, can inject relationships with some much-needed novelty and excitement.

To the rabbit, the world is simply an easy hedonistic paradise where you while away your days banging and enjoying pleasures. Sacrifice, loyalty, or greater causes have no place in their thought processes.

This psychology only arises when there is an extensive resource glut, and it builds with each successive generation exposed to the glut. That implies epigenetics, something confirmed by research into animal reproductive strategies.

That this is the political battle writ large is the last piece of the puzzle, and once that is taught in schools, everything will change.

Spread r/K Theory, because raising kids right is more important than the rabbits think

This entry was posted in Decline, Liberals, Politics, Psychology, r-stimuli, rabbitry, Rearing Differences, Sexual Deviance. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
7 years ago

[…] The Rabbits Of CNN Rethink Monogamy […]

David
David
7 years ago

Everything in pop culture pushes actions that cause happiness to become impossible. Breaking physical from emotional intimacy is catastrophically stupid, so it’s encouraged.

Dave
Dave
7 years ago

There’s another way polygamy might re-emerge: When there’s a shortage of potential husbands due to war, economic collapse, or large numbers of men “going their own way”. Women might decide that being a second or third wife is a better deal than being a single mom, especially if bankrupt governments can no longer protect them from hunger, violence, and homelessness. This affects not only the women on WIC/EBT/Section 8, but also those who hold cushy, government-subsidized jobs in education, healthcare, and social services.

chris
chris
Reply to  Dave
7 years ago

If bankrupt governments could no longer “protect” the women, men would not be going their own way. MGTOW exists because the government enforces unjust family laws against men to women’s benefit.