Two NYPD cops killed in retaliation for Eric Garner’s death, while DeBlasio observes from safety. When I see this, I see the transvestite cuttlefish seizing mating opportunities, while competitors are occupied fighting each other. DeBlasio is a hard core rabbit, who no doubt dislikes the K-selected culture of aggression, competitiveness, and loyalty you find in K-selected populations such as the Police. He seeks the support of the angry and aggressive in-grouping class of the black community. At the same time, he tries to appear neutral to police, to avoid open conflict with them. Yet by his actions, he fosters acrimony, to the point that the Police even begin to out-group him.
If I saw a species in nature, with fighters and cowards, and the cowards got the fighters to kill each other while the cowards hid and avoided fighting, I would see it as a strategy. The cowards were getting the fighters to kill each other, so it would free up resources and mating opportunities for the cowards. I see this as no different, simply because I am a member of the species being examined. These urges evolved in nature, and were retained due to their utility in today’s world. Clearly DeBlasio’s strategy is designed for a grossly different environment than, say Ronald Reagan’s strategy. DeBlasio is the rabbit, who has learned to pit the wolves against each other.
That we see this same theme among Liberals, from the embrace of radical Muslims today, to the embrace of Communists during the Cold War, to the embrace of foreign barbarians in the Roman Empire, says this arises not from intellectual conclusions or logical analysis, but rather from a deeply imbued psychological drive to relax at the sight of the competitive attacking each other. Two aggressive in-groups, fighting each other, is an amygdala relaxant to the rabbit.
This is merely the beginning. When the crisis hits, rabbit amygdalae will go into overdrive, and they will require quite a battle between K-strategists to distract them from their own misery.
The spirit which drove the Nazis will rise again, and it will do so on the shoulders of rabbits.
AA read this and tell me how it figures.
http://www.hagmannandhagmann.com/archives/1297
do narcissists do group or is this just the animal? or a vulgar example of r ?
AL lot of us have amygdala pathways laid down which constrain our behavior, and which do so in a way we don’t really notice. Imagine attacking a pretty girl, or hurting a puppy purposefully. It just isn’t on our radar, because our amygdala would short circuit the very idea before it ever got near an action. For some reason, when we are programmed like this, we subconsciously assume others are as well. That girl bumped up against guys who would do things she never thought possible because of her own programming. It is the same with the elites. They will do stuff we couldn’t imagine, because they are programmed very differently.
The idea of Narcissists grouping is interesting. Tough to say. Maybe they aren’t narcissists, so much as some other form of amygdala-deficiency, produced by some cultural issue which results in them not seeing something as out of bounds.
Whatever the cause, when evil amasses, its greatest strength is when its victim doesn’t fully understand its nature. Because if you understand evil, you will eradicate it immediately by any means necessary.
Commenting to make sure I’m understanding: There would be much less of a hubbub if these police officers had been white because that would have tripped the switch that says “this could have been me” and relegated the execution to imponderable status. We would instead have heard white liberals saying these two cops had it coming.
I think their status as cops eclipses their race practically, both among those on the job and among society at large, possibly due to the relatively homogenous culture among patrol oifficers. If a I hear a cop (or military member) is killed, it doesn’t matter whether he is white, black, or Hispanic – it will feel the same. There are cultures in society which transcend race.
I was mainly saying if random white rabbits in suburbia began getting taken out by trigger happy police, and the rabbit felt that they could be next, they’d be much less enthused to talk about it or yell chants at protests. I think it is why Michael Brown got more press and attention than Garner. Brown was a genuine rabid savage who needed to be put down, while Eric Garner was just an apparently nice guy selling cigarettes for pocket change, when police intervened in his life needlessly, and caused his death. Why trumpet Brown, who had it coming, when Garner was a much better case, from a PR-perspective?
Rabbits know they’ll never charge a cop and try to kill him, so Brown wasn’t too triggering to think about. Garner could happen to anyone, though, and that is bothersome. If you are creating a victim fantasy camp, go with the one which makes the fantasy all fun, and no worry.
If anyplace needs a K selected leader at the helm, it is NYC. With an r selected “leader” it will certainly descend into chaos. Deblasio and his cohorts may think they are safe and in control, but, many of the warring factions will discover that rabbit meat tastes good.
Yeah, wait until the economic collapse happens. It will be like a zombie movie.
Yeah, NYC has about a day of food stored up, if the situation deteriorates to the point food delivery trucks become afraid to enter. That place is going to be an animal house.
Here is what stated in a previous post–If your amygdala is developed, it has been developed through experience. When it encounters adversity, it scans your brain for a solution, finds it stored in memories of prior experiences, and it will then drive behaviors to address your adversity.
From what I recall from Psychology 101, the function of the amygdala is responsible for instinctual reactions, e.g. fear, aggression. This region develops EARLY. The frontal cortex controls reasoning and helps us think before act. This part develops LATER.
So, based on this information, it would appear you ought to be referring to the frontal lobe rather than the amygdala regarding the decision making of “rabbits”.
Unless, of course, there is someone out there that is able to offer sources that validate your theory involving this unique role of the amygdala.
Actually, the amygdala has extensive connections with nearly every part of the brain, in both directions, in some cases. It scans everything for threat, motivates action in the case of threat, and governs far more about our nature than we realize. A threat, realized logically, will still trip the amygdala, even though it was not the amygdala which performed the logical processing that led to the threat stimuli. The more I read on it (and I do have formal training in Cognitive Neurosci, for what it is worth), the more I see the amygdala as the origin of the forces which guide the data-processing of the brain to yield a personality, or spirit. It wires into everything, and through the motive forces it provides, guides thought and analysis into a personality.
The late Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn said the way to deal with leftists was “to knock their heads,” i.e. terminate with extreme prejudice.
That is a very effective technique. My guess is, given the insanity which is approaching in Europe, we will see it employed at some point, and the moment it is used, every visible leftist will either denounce their faith, or evaporate into the ether.