Nothing else to say. He dominated, slipped in a lot of amygdala hijacks, turned Hillary into the angry ex-wife, made himself the leader, and beat her on the issues.
- Since beginning this site, we have encountered what most people would never believe could exist - the massive domestic network of spies and civilian informants, exactly like the East German Stasi, that has been created and deployed against the American people within America, by whoever controls our government. If you are a conservative who supports Donald Trump, it is most likely operating in your neighborhood, and spying on your family, even though you have never seen it, and would never believe it possible. Our writings on this subject are the most important contribution this website will make for America, which is why it is at the top of our sidebar. You need to click here first for the summary, or go to
our main website on the subject at AmericanStasi.com, to read our book on how to spot the domestic intelligence machine in America which is targeting you and your children in the schools. Interesting Links An Examination of the Domestic Surveillance Informant Network Narcissism and the Fractured Amygdala Touching the Raw Amygdala: An Analysis of Liberal Debate Tactics The Amygdala Hijack In Action – A Video Example From Gary Busey Amygdala Hijack In Action – Sentencing Day Strategies for Dealing with Narcissists in Family and Social Circles GATE General - An Analysis of the Oddities of the Gifted And Talented Enrichment Program Politics and r/K Selection – A Graph The Forces Exerted By r and K-Selection Effects Mold the Ideological Inclinations of Societies – How Resource Availability Determines Destiny Neurological Correlates of Political Ideology and Homosexuality - The Extreme r-Hypothesis of Homosexuality DRD4 Long Form Variant (7r) - A Genetic Correlate Between Liberalism and Homosexuality - The Extreme r-Hypothesis of Homosexuality Please check out the book, The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics, which is available at Amazon at the link below. It is also offered free in Kindle format periodically. For more on that offer, see: AnonymousConservative.com. Buy the book now at Amazon.com here: What are r and K? This site asks for your help in promoting the idea that our political ideologies evolved from r/K Selection Theory in evolutionary ecology. In evolutionary ecology, r and K describe two fundamental psychologies seen in nature, designed to adapt an organism to either a glut or a shortage. Rabbits are r-strategists, designed to exploit free resources, like fields of grass. The five psychological traits inherent to the r-strategy are docility/conflict-avoidance, promiscuity/non-monogamy, single-mom'ing, early sexualization of young, and no loyalty to a competitive in-group. All help this glut-exploiting psychology to out-reproduce everyone else by avoiding danger, mating widely starting young, booting offspring early to mate again, and never risking for others . Wolves are K-strategists, designed for when resources are too limited for everyone to survive. The five traits of a K-strategist are competitiveness/ aggressiveness/protectiveness, competitive mate monopolization/ monogamy, high-investment two-parent rearing, only mating when mature, and high loyalty to one's competitive in-group. All these traits either help you win when you have to fight, or produce and protect fitter offspring, so they will win in a dangerous world that culls the weak. Our political battle is one between a glut-exploiting r-reproductive strategy of rabbits designed to produce raw numbers and a shortage-surviving K-reproductive strategy of wolves designed to produce quality. The swings between conservatism and liberalism at the societal level are not the result of logical argument or reasoned debate. They are the result of psychological shifts produced by perceptions of K-stimuli in the environment such as conflict, danger, and shortage, or r-stimuli, such as safety, pleasure, and abundance. These perceptions trigger ancient mechanisms in the brain that adapt psychology to environment. All of politics and much of history are r vs K. Please consider helping to spread this theory by telling others about this site. As you can see by the shocked 5 star reviews on the book's Amazon page linked above, this idea, and the science behind it, blows people away when they see it. And best of all, it will utterly demoralize and crush any leftist you describe it to, in unbelievable fashion. This idea's beneficial effects on our governance and our freedom cannot be overestimated, if it can only spread. Meta
I”m 100% on the Trump train but I don’t know if he won tonight. Clinton was a pit bull tonight and threw out attack after attack. I know how she’s lying but does anyone else that follows political blogs?
I don’t think Mike Wallace was any better than the other moderators. I wish he’d shut up and let them speak.
To me she looked bitter and robotic, and her answers were simply memorized. Trump seemed to crush her on Presidential manner, and her ineffectiveness.
[…] Nothing else to say. He dominated, slipped in a lot of amygdala hijacks, turned Hillary into the angry ex-wife, made himself the leader, and beat her on the issues. The post continue […]
Personally I was hoping for something more like the second debate. That one was awesome. But I suppose Trump was playing it strategically, maybe doing it this way is a smarter move. I do like how he didn’t cave to the question about rigged elections. Keeping us in suspense… 🙂
Good luck America, I’m confident the better candidate will prevail.
I haven’t watched the parts where he dominated, but that, ‘no, /you’re/ the puppet! You’re the puppet!/ was cringeworthy and un-presidential. I hope by listening to something other than NPR I’ll hear his good bits 🙂
That is one reason I am sure Trump understands amygdala. What he was doing was interrupting Hillary’s attempt to execute a technical process, namely the recitation of a prepared reply. That is tough in front of a crowd, to organize your thoughts, and get them out in a strong voice, in a way that convinces others. All throughout the debate, as she tried to do that, he would interrupt her, breaking her chain of thought, and thwarting her.
In the short term, maybe some people thought it was rude, but it triggered Hillary, threw her off her game, and at the end of the debate, she looked more like an angry and bitter ex-wife, than a leader of men. The gains, in imagry, were far more than the small cost of interrupting her to rebut some bitter accusation she made.