Feminism, Seen In History

Great quote I am stealing from Vault-Co:

Here’s the paragraph from Sir Glubb in The Fate of Empires :

“An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded. Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.

Why would a wealthy declining hedonistic civilization always see women rise and demand leadership positions, and view childbearing and baking cookies for nurturing as somehow beneath them? Why would a civilization in ascendance always see men demand leadership positions, and women content to raise children and nurture them as well as they can?

r/K Selection Theory not only explains this reversal in sex-specific behaviors, it predicts them.

It is interesting to see that in history it has played out pretty much as we all know it will here, once the K-shift happens.

Feminism not only collapses when it meets reality – it brings the very reality that collapses it.