Xenophobia and Fear

The Atlantic tries the classic rabbit tactic of linking competitiveness and fear:

Pregnant women in their first trimester, as it turns out, also exhibit more ethnocentric and xenophobic attitudes than those further along in their pregnancies. That’s a trend researchers have found across studies and across borders: The more vulnerable we feel to disease, the more likely we are to want to build a proverbial wall (and make Mexico pay for it!). One early study by Schaller and others found that people who are more worried about getting sick are more likely to associate foreign groups with danger and have more hostile attitudes toward foreign-immigrant groups. In another experiment, Canadians who were shown images of infectious diseases were less likely to support immigrants from exotic-seeming countries, such as Mongolia, than were those who saw images of other types of threats, like car accidents.

The findings have held up across cultures. Over the course of several studies, Murray and Schaller have found that countries that suffered a greater prevalence of diseases like malaria and leprosy were also more likely to be collectivist and conformist, as measured by things like personality variation among the country’s citizens and the number of left-handed people. (In some more traditional cultures, naturally left-handed kids are forced to train themselves to become right-handed.) The two researchers have also found that people in more disease-addled countries are less likely to be extroverted or open to new experiences. If people would just behave traditionally, act in unison, and eschew strangers, the behavioral immune system’s thinking seems to be, maybe they wouldn’t catch diphtheria.

Could a subconscious fear of disease be part of what’s prompting Trump supporters to cheer his plan to ban Muslims and Mexicans?

I want to attack liberals for trying to link these things with fear. To me, it feels as if it is a clear case of the liberal trying to make more competitive psychologies sound cowardly to the passing observer, unlike the brave liberal who proudly lets his wife, his family, and his nation be cuckolded by savage foreigners, as he sits in the corner watching without all that cowardly fear.

But I suspect that my initial feelings about the situation are mistaken. I suspect our larger amygdalae are not just better at discerning danger, and motivating us to oppose it. I suspect that our more complex amygdalae apply a similarly more complex suite of feelings to our brain to motivate us in a more complex variety of ways – and the liberal brain is completely unable to even begin to understand any of it.

It has often been said, liberals are sheep with only two speeds – graze and stampede. That liberal amygdala tends to either be coddled by ignorance, obliviousness, or outright denial into a state of blissful narcosis, or it is in epic panic mode, with no ability to discern nuance. The more liberal you go, the more the radical Muslim ISIS follower is a fine bloke to have a beer with, while a brief talk with Milo has them dropping like flies from mental breakdowns. The amygdala of a liberal is either at a panic level of zero, or redlining just above ten as it sparks and smokes into meltdown.

K-strategists are different. K-strategists analyze circumstances, and receive from their amygdalae a more complex motivational force. Like any human, K-strategists can feel utter panic, and feel driven by their amygdala to seek a pathway to escape – liberals understand that just fine.

A K-strategist may also feel a temporal fear-like-aversion which they know exists only temporarily, motivating them to execute a momentary tactical retreat, in preparation for a ruthless counter-attack. That is more of an intellectual, “don’t do that” aversion feeling, than what a liberal would describe as fear. It is like seeing a hot stove and not feeling fear, but knowing not to touch it. I don’t think liberals understand that one at all, judging by the easily-avoidable, stupid things they do which any idiot could see are going to hurt later.

The K-strategist may also feel anger, even feeling driven to die on the tip of a sword if necessary to stymie some enemy – a motivational force which I suspect could not be explained to a liberal any more than I could explain to you what another color beyond the visible spectrum looked like. You know what red, orange, green, blue and purple look like? You know how they are all different from one another? Picture another color just like them, but just as different from them as they are from each other – a color you have never seen. Liberals just don’t fearlessly die for their causes – they lack the emotional motivator. It is an emotional color they can’t imagine, having never seen it. It is a color beyond graze, and stampede. Kind of like stampede, only in reverse, turned around 180 degrees, and motivated by something completely different.

K-strategists can even feel love, and it will mix in the amygdala to create a mixed drive which will leave them motivated to die for that. The military man who jumps on a hand grenade can’t really see a description of his emotional drive reduced to the fear we see liberals castigate us for, or anger at any individual. It is an amygdala-applied cognitive force which I suspect you could never explain to a Bill Clinton. To him it is a color, just like red, but different from any other color he has ever seen. It isn’t stampede, or graze, or even stampede in reverse and turned around – it is like flying straight upward, for a totally different reason than motivated any of the other actions.

So when a liberal sees a K-strategist do something, and says, “They do that because they are afraid,” I think they are just looking at all the emotional colors they have ever seen, namely blissful ignorance and utter panic, and trying to liken the behavior they see to some emotional color which they are familiar with. If it isn’t consistent with bliss, it must be fear.

More and more, I think living within a liberal brain is one of the worst curses life could inflict upon you. From the lack of richness in one’s emotional life, to needing therapy after hearing Milo speak for a few minutes, it just seems as if liberalism is a living nightmare which liberals would really want to wake up from, if only they knew how nice it is to not be afflicted with the amygdala-deficiency underlying their malady.

Unfortunately for them, conservative thought processes are a cognitive color they have never seen.

This entry was posted in Amygdala, Conservatives, Cowardice, Cuckservatives, Liberals, Nationalism, Politics, Psychology, rabbitry. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
8 years ago

[…] By Anonymous Conservative […]

jddyalblog
8 years ago

I think the three laws of SJWs apply well here: no. 3 is SJWs always project. Liberals always call conservatives cowards, even when it makes no sense whatsoever, because liberals are such cowards themselves. They don’t actually know what bravery is.

everlastingphelps
everlastingphelps
8 years ago

Fear is a good thing. Fear is the recognition of danger. Being fearless means you never have a chance to be courageous, because you have to know that the situation is dangerous before it is courageous. The guy who jumps in front of a train to push someone out of its way is courageous. Mr. Bean narrowly avoiding ambling out of the way of a train he never saw is not. He’s just stupid.

Liberals have a completely broken fear mechanism. You can see it in their brain structures, you can measure it in studies. In a proper fear response, your amygdala (which has independent pathways to your sense centers in the brain) picks up something that it thinks may be dangerous. Based on instinct and past encounters, it rates this danger, starts a Fight or Flight (FoF) response, and then directs the hippocampus (the higher functioning part of the limbic system) to assess the threat.

The thing is, while it is just the amygdala, this is all reflex — there is no conscious thought involved. This is more of a startle response than a fear response. That’s why in a movie where something innocuous pops out of nowhere, you jump — your amygdala has caught this sudden, unexpected movement, hit the alarm, and asked the hippocampus, “DUDE, WHAT WAS THAT? IS THAT IMPORTANT?” You jump (reflexively — you can’t stop it), your heart races, your breathing quickens — and just as quickly, your hippocampus says, “this is a movie, false alarm” and your heartrate etc immediately start going back to normal. That’s because it is all reflex.

On the other hand, if you’ve had that startle response because you suddenly realize there’s a guy behind you on a dark street wearing a ski mask and holding a knife, that response it not going to go to normal. The hippocampus instead says, “oh shit, this is the real deal, cerebrum, you need to handle this while I trigger the full blown FoF response!” Now you are into fear rather than startle.

I say all of that to say this — the amygdala is not part of your conscious mind. It is one of the most neuroplastic parts of your brain — meaning it is always learning, long into adulthood. What does it learn? 1) It adds new possible threats to its independent memory and 2) It remembers how big a danger the cerebrum eventually decided the situation was. The liberal amygdala not only does it’s job slower and more poorly (as evidenced by the gaze tracking studies that show that it takes longer for the gaze to settle on a threatening image with liberals) but their amygdalas do not adapt and acclimate to new fears as readily as the normal population. (And yes, we are the normal population — there are more conservatives than liberals in America.)

(This amygdala memory is a big part of PTSD. When you are under stress for a long time, your amygdala is primed to make lots of connections, and when the traumatic event that triggers PTSD happens, your amygdala decides that everything about that situation is an A-1 Prime Threat Indicator, including things like, “the sun was out” and “I was wearing shoes.”)

disenchantedscholar
Reply to  everlastingphelps
8 years ago

Humans are the worst disease vectors. It is maternal instinct to avoid all danger, even pungent scent that could be rot or filth, and foreign pathogens like Zika are known to cause birth defects. I love how they throw women under the bus like evolution doesn’t know its business. Classy.

mobiuswolf
8 years ago

No wonder the ‘entertainment’ they dish up is so two dimensional.

disenchantedscholar
8 years ago

I’m beginning to think r-types are limited to their basic Fight/Flight pattern, except in their case it’s Swarm or Withdraw. I’ve noticed many of their so-called panic attacks or anxiety are merely the symptoms of chronic High Cortisol in the body from repeated triggering of that mechanism (that they seek out by hate-reading and stirring s–t).