“Cheating Hillary” Uses A Covert Induction Earpiece In the Debate Against Trump

Caught on the Twittersphere:

This indicates two things. One, Hillary is wracked with insecurity and anxiety. This is not the move of a person confident in their own ability to step on stage and discuss issues intelligently. She needed this buffer between her and the raw, unrefined onslaught of facing Donald J. Trump, or she will just be too afraid.

Two, Hillary feels grossly inferior to Trump in some way that she requires someone’s assistance. That someone may very well have been Robert Cialdini, or one of his people, feeding her “persuasion lines” designed to compete with Trump’s mastery of persuasion. This is great, because now that we know about this, Trump can employ countermeasures, to rob Hillary of this at the next debate.

It also might indicate Hillary has had some significant cognitive decline due to her strokes and concussions, possibly relating to memory, making debate prep very difficult, and necessitating this form of cheating. This was not done lightly.

Now some other thoughts.

The inductive earpiece Hillary is using is somewhat larger than the state of the art today, which is designed to be completely hidden inside the ear canal, being inserted and removed with a special tool. The state of the art is essentially undetectable, even up close, though I am not aware of it being made available to civilians. As you can see at this site, where the page Title is coded as “GSM smallest inductive radio cheat invisible Bluetooth exam micro nano earpiece“, they are commonly sold in the private sector to students for purposes of cheating on tests.

Although a less sophisticated model common to the private sector, that type of induction earpiece was originally designed to facilitate covert communications by surveillance operatives in the field. It is part of what is commonly referred to in the business as a three-wire body communications rig. The unit consists of a main radio unit that is concealed on the body and contains the receiver, transmitter, battery, and associated circuitry, as well as a three-wire harness. One wire exits the main receiver unit and leads to a covert microphone, most commonly taped to the center of the chest between the pectoral muscles, under the clothes, though sometimes it can be routed through a sleeve to the wrist. A second wire contains a squelch button, usually leading into a front pants pocket, into which an operative would casually reach to key open a channel when they wanted to transmit. Sometimes the squelch button is routed to the sleeve, where it can be pinched to open a channel to transmit. The third wire is routed over the shoulder on the side of the earpiece, to be close to it, and it is an inductor wire, which creates a fluctuating electromagnetic field, based on the communications sent.

The earpiece used to use what was at least a 24 hour battery, though technology has improved. The earpiece detects the field fluctuations of the inductor wire, and converts them to sound (radio signal reception and conversion would require too much energy consumption, compared to induction field conversion, however the power limitations within the earpiece also mean there is no encryption over this phase of transmission either).

A fourth antenna wire is usually attached to the radio, and threaded up over the shoulder opposite to the earpiece inductor wire, and that is what receives team transmissions and broadcasts out to the team.

There are two possibilities for transmission. One is cell phone, and one is radio frequencies.

Although the radio frequency would probably be encrypted, and cell phone would be impenetrable, the induction wire’s transmissions would not be out of reach. Thus it might be possible with the correct technology, for Trump to place something small within range of the inductor wire, designed to capture what is being transmitted, and rebroadcast it to a receiver/recorder on him for purposes of recording. If he wanted to play, he could have something disposable cooked up, pat Hillary on the back to stick it to her, and then it would transmit the induction signal to him, where he would record the feed for future release and embarrassment.

Even if he didn’t do that, but he let it out he was thinking of it, and then he smartly patted her on the back a few times at the start of the next debate as he smiled to the crowd with a shit-eating grin, she would spend the rest of the debate trying to fake itch her back to feel if he stuck something there, and be freaked out. It would be a major amygdala hijack. Or he could stick something small to the podium to perform the same function, in the interest of keeping Cheatin’ Hillary from doing her thing. It is even possible if they were close enough, he could pick up the inductor’s transmissions with something in his upper inside jacket pocket.

Although I think it unlikely, if it was radio, Trump could ask SS for their frequencies, and then hire a professional to scan the spectrum for any outside frequencies, and jam them when they are found. If he knew this was coming, he might even be able to overpower Cialdini’s’s transmitter, and pipe insults and ridicule into her ear through the whole debate, Rickroll her, or provide some other loud, harsh, amygdala hijacking, physically uncomfortable, distracting stimulus that she would be unable to stop under the glare of the lights on stage, and all of the cameras.

If she was using either radio or the cell network, he could even stick his own inductor on her, or in her podium, wired into a burner phone or radio of his, to pipe his stream into her earpiece along side Cialdini’s. He might even be able to use a beefed up inductor on him to overpower her’s, though the exponential drop in field strength with distance would require quite a powerful unit, likely custom made, and close proximity. But to have a seizure-prone decrepit, who bobs around uncontrollably at every loud noise, forced to absorb whatever Trump wanted to put into her ear, would be priceless. And she could never complain, because she would have to admit to the earpiece to do it.

The possibilities are endless, if Roger Stone wanted to get involved. If I were doing it, given Hillary’s propensity to have a seizure when exposed to sudden loud noises, I would create a recording beforehand containing alternating periods of quiet, unpredictably interspersed with sudden, amygdala-triggering loud noises. Everything from sudden outbreaks of machinegun fire, to sudden loud dying rabbit calls, to sudden ear-shattering Bulgarian disco, to nails on chalkboards, babies crying, women shrieking, “Pepe Sig Hail!” and so on, all interspersed with quiet, and interjected unexpectedly. It would be quite a sight to see Hillary just suddenly start her bobble-head routine on stage, stop, laugh, fake her head roll as if to say, I meant to do that, and then act as if nothing happened, before it all happened again, seemingly for no reason at all.

If this was run on regular radio signals (again, unlikely but possible), Secret Service is not just going to have an encrypted radio feed they cannot listen to, unexpectedly start flying around a protected venue, and not concern themselves with it. I am pretty sure if I showed up with an encrypted walkie, opened a channel, and began transmitting an encrypted feed of gibberish, the Secret Service’s Technical Services Division would immediately detect the encrypted traffic, notify the on scene commander, and the shit would immediately begin to hit the fan behind the scenes, because that could easily be an attack about to happen. They might even have the ability to triangulate signals at venues. If it was radio, either Secret Service was warned by the Clinton camp this was coming, Secret Service ran it for the Clinton camp on request, or the feed was unencrypted, so Secret Service could listen in and determine it was just the normal innocent cheating common to the Clinton camp.

If it was either of the first two, Trump could force Secret Service to reveal what they know, by threatening to portray them as helping Clinton cheat in a debate. Either they knew about the comms, and made a special exemption for Hillary to help her cheat, or they set up the comm network, and helped her cheat. The optics on both are atrocious, because if they are interfering in the process to help one candidate sabotage another, what honest candidate will want them within a country mile of their campaign. They would be seen as campaign saboteurs.

If however, as may be most likely, it was run on the cell phone network, then Trump, or a minion in the audience close enough to Hillary, could just pick up a pocket cell phone jammer off Ebay, and then casually reach in a pocket and bip it on and off to cause Hillary’s phone to drop the call at the start of the debate, and after each commercial break (during which she would presumably try to reconnect). It is an FCC violation, but the chances of trouble are slim for the gain received, considering it would just be a few short bips to break the connection, nobody could really say why one of the people in the audience was doing it since nobody should have been on their phone anyway, and Hillary could never admit she needed the phone line to cheat at the debate.

Once the call was dropped, it would be very difficult for Hillary to deal with her phone on stage to reconnect, so it would be as effective as jamming. Just the violation of expectation alone would be immensely amygdala hijacking, and distracting. If you knew her phone number and could then call it, and she tried to covertly reconnect by reaching in a pocket, thinking it was Cialdini, or whoever, then you would have a line into her ear, and the game would be on all over again.

I hope Trump plays this in the future somehow, given all the opportunities he has, even if he only uses it to stick the new moniker, “Cheatin’ Hillary” on her.