It would appear that way. Coincidence?
A tweet by Mr. Breitbart shortly before his March 1, 2012, death is now being cited by online researchers as proof that they are onto something big.
“How prog-guru John Podesta isn’t household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me,” Mr. Breitbart wrote Feb. 4, 2011.
The conservative icon’s death at age 43 was attributed to “heart failure.”
Knowledge of the late conservative’s tweet sent Google searches for “Andrew Breitbart” skyrocketing Sunday night as news spread to members of Twitter, Reddit, GAB, Voat and other social media platforms.
It is tempting when you take an extreme level of security precautions to assume you have secured your identity and the government has no idea who you are. Indeed, the precautions themselves can be amygdala-assuaging, calming your anxieties and giving you a sense of security.
You need to fight that, because that sense of security will make you complacent, and it will make you do stupid things.
In short, you need to process several facts, and then act, constantly, as if you are an active enemy of the state who is personally known to it.
First, the people in power have access to government resources, and thus have nearly limitless resources, and total technological superiority – and you are using their platform, owned and controlled by them. Chances are overwhelming, they know exactly who you are. Even if you evaded their identification online by hiding who you are completely, you have probably tripped a tripwire in the database by being a 20-40 year old male, with masculine traits like a firearm or motorcycle license, who has no record online.
Which means your name probably popped up on the desktop of some beancounter in a basement somewhere, whose who job is to take a look at your data more closely for an hour, to see who you are, because people like that tend to be more interesting than most. That revealed that your address had a bill for cable internet with the local cable company under an anonymous shell company you set up. That might cause him to spend thirty minutes figuring out your online identity based on the cable company’s traffic history, so it can be attached to your file.
And if you stay a mystery? It is likely at that level, the guys they can’t easily figure out in ten minutes of database searches get much closer scrutiny, because they are so rare.
Even successfully avoiding the machine, if you manage to, can draw attention and bring it in even closer, just because nobody does that, and the few who do, the government has learned through experience, tend to be interesting because they tend to be avoiding for a reason.
So you need to assume you are known. And if you are known, you are vulnerable.
The first thing that means is, no more buying food from other people, unless it is sealed and randomly chosen, in such a way there is no way they could poison you without poisoning hundreds of other people.
If Brietbart was about to break open Pizza-gate back in 2011, (and it appears he was poking around) he would have been under threat.
But he was Breitbart. You can’t shoot him, or even arrange a car accident. The right would have known, and that could have escalated things. You look at his record, and there is a heart condition. All you have to do is increase the load on his heart to the point it burns out. That is simple enough to do, if you can get access to his food. So you pull his surveillance file, of which I have no doubt he had one.
Where does he go? What does he do? There is always a chink. In Breitbart’s case, he visited a bar periodically. You look at who the bartenders are when Brietbart visits. All it takes is $10,000 in a roll of $100 bills to get one to quit on the spot, at an inopportune time for the owner, and then you send your guy in to coincidentally apply for a job at that moment, just as the owner wants to open his bar but has no bartender. He will of course hire your guy on the spot, even if just to test him out, and think himself lucky your guy just happened to come in at that moment. Now your guy is making drinks for Breitbart.
All he does is smear an imperceptible amount of the thyroid hormone tri-iodo thyronine (which can induce hundreds of beat per minute heartbeats in a single milligram dose), on the inside of a wine glass before Breitbart shows up, and sets it aside (you know Breitbart orders wine, and even his favored brand and year, because it is in his surveillance file). Then, when Breitbart comes in (you know he is coming because he is covered 24/7 and you know his patterns), you take that glass and serve him his wine. 30 minutes later Breitbart is dead of a heart attack.
Nobody knows, because Tri-iodothyronine is produced naturally by the body, nobody ever tests for it, and even if they did in this case I am not sure whatever was in his system wouldn’t be bound out to receptors by the time Brietbart’s blood was drawn. Even if it tested high, a coroner is going to think of natural over-production like hyper-thyroidism or thyroid storm before he thinks poison.
Surveillance never knows, because they just assemble the files, and put them in the database. The broader intel apparatus never knows, because you didn’t invovle them. All you needed was one person on the inside to access the file, and I am sure the system is set up to conceal file accesses anyway, since everything at that level is about plausible deniability of everything.
You keep your guy in the job for a few weeks, maybe a few months, to avert suspicion, and then you can move him out. Nobody except the one guy who put the material in the glass will ever know what happened, you probably selected him because you own him through blackmail, and who knows what even happens to him a few weeks later.
Compared to the potential exposure of a raft of Clintonites and Democrats possibly running an international pedofile/ child-sex trafficking ring, Brietbart’s murder would be a no-brainer.
You see how easy it is. If you stop for a Big Mac periodically somewhere, buy a pizza at a pizza shop, order take-out, eat at a resturaunt, get an ice cream cone, or even mail order anything edible (they own/have-infiltrated all the shipping companies), you are vulnerable. Even if you don’t, it is not impossible they can turn some associate at whose house you occaisionally dine.
You probably can’t eliminate every chink, but you can close up enough to make your hit difficult, and your vulnerability not easy to predict.
My own feeling was something always stunk about Breitbart’s demise. Now I know much more about this government, and I can say without a doubt the machinery is definitely out there to make this happen, and there is enough of it I would be surprised if a majority of the Pizzagate researchers are not getting files built up on them already.
More and more, Pizzagate appears to be God’s work, but that doesn’t mean you won’t find yourself walking through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. Understand where you are, see your reality clearly, and make the best choices you can based upon your real position in the world. It may not be easy or fun, but nothing really magnificent that has been done in this nation ever has been. Even when it gets bad, in cases like these, it is better to be on the side of right, than have it easy.
Spread #Pizzagate to your acquaintances to, because r/K Theory is not the only good cause out there
[…] Breitbart Was Probing Pizzagate When He Mysteriously Died? […]
The problem for the Enemy with stopping #pizzagate is that they would have to whack a LOT of people to stop it at this point. Then they could whack one guy, someone who was a thorn in their side anyway, and eliminate the problem for what has been years. Now they would have to take out a few dozen and hope it stopped the “weaponized autism” from continuing to dig.
They need a different tactic, probably a sacrifice. Pick someone expendable and let the spergs reap their pound of flesh. The problem is there isn’t a plausible way to limit it to just Comet or even just Podesta & co. If one domino falls many more almost certainly would.
In the end that is why I doubt this goes anywhere. It is just too big, everyone will in the end cover it up because it simply can’t come out. Revealing this thing would cause more social disorder than aliens landing on the White House lawn. There might be a quiet purge by Trump to eliminate the worst (i.e. most reckless and likely to cause another near reveal) of the bunch but it will happen out of the spotlight.
One thing puzzles me about this recurring scandal (there have been other elites caught and prosecuted for pedophilia and sex trafficking etc.):
Why the hell hasn’t an outraged parent or two simply taken care of the problem the old-fashioned way?
Do they mainly target chidren that don’t have strong protectors or guardians?
What would you or I do if one of our children were so abused?
I know what I would do. There would be no trial.
Why hasn’t one of these SOBs been summarily executed?
I hate to say it, but they seem to know what kids are vulnerable, and what they can get away with. Evil doesn’t have to be stupid.
When it’s family members actively engaged…!
https://youtu.be/sLgNm_ay4Sk
His death was A YEAR after that tweet. If it had been a month, that would have been far more compelling evidence of a causal relationship.
Tough to say. He obviously was using the terms to trigger Podesta, which implies to me he was aware of some rumors and though it was a soft spot. If Podesta was into anything like that, he would freak at that tweet, and see it as a threat.
I find it hard to believe a guy who knew self promotion, hated the left, hated the Clintons, wanted clicks and notoriety to boost his brand, and saw himself as a warrior for good, wouldn’t chase down such allegations. I agree he wasn’t about to publish when that tweet went out, but he seemed interested in the link between Podesta and those phrases.
I remember having a very strange argument in the comments at Breitbart over one of the articles about Andrew’s death. I accepted natural causes as the most likely explanation, especially considering the insights of some of his friends into his general health, but suggested that even so, considering the timing, supposing a five to ten percent probability of foul play wasn’t out of the question. Surely, there must be some way to hold a rational discussion about an unlikely but not altogether inconceivable scenario.
Looking at how a couple of people responded to me, you would have thought I was selling perpetual motion chi stabilizer bracelets.
There are persistent rumors that Julian Assange is dead and has been dead a while. Given his talk of a serious bomb shell leading to Hillary’s arrest before the election, do you think this is likely? If he is dead why try to pretend he’s still alive? Wikileaks has been awfully quiet for a while.
There isn’t enough data to speculate with any certainty. But my guess would be he is in a hole somewhere. The prevalence of the belief that he is gone and Wikileaks is compromised has to be negatively affecting Wikileak’s ability to operate and gain sources. I would think he would arrange a meeting with someone, even Milo, to get word out he is fine, and restore confidence.
If he was dead, or poisoned, I could see keeping him alive in spirit to spoof him, and see what the back end of Wikileaks looked like to him, and who all populated it. But I would think him alive, though somehow contained. It would seem killing him would be unnecessarily gratuitous, and not sufficiently advantageous.
Fuckin A. Black helicopters used to fly over my house giving me panic attacks. One day I decied that if they were gonna kill or torture me, they best get on with it. I don’t give a shit anymore. I WOULD RATHER EXPEND MY LIFE FIGHTING EVIL than stay silent and know that I could have changed the hearts and minds of my fellow man. These sick fuck pedophiles have been operating with impunity for centuries. If I AND MY BROTHERS, don’t take them down. Nobody will. We are the resistance. Masculinity is their greatest enemy. It’s time to show it. It’s time to bring these sick perverts down.
There’s lots of this. I’ve posted this link before but it’s a good link if you haven’t seen it.
These guys got away. No charges. They like orphans a lot.
Yikes.
Go look up the Franklin Scandal. I am convinced that is what prompted the Deep State to slide from the Bush Clan to Clinton Gang (via the blunt instrument of Perot), that and always making sure that they had firm control of both wings of the RedBluDuopoly. The Franklin Scandal is a text-book case of sanitization — a suicide, a well-timed plane crash, a handful of compromised LEOs, editors, and judges, public ridicule/destruction of witnesses/victims. In context, not that difficult to pull off. What is vital is understanding that not all members of the conspiracy need to be motivated by the same thing. No one issues orders, “Here’s what we do to protect our pedo ring” — any dirty secret will do and fear issues its own directives. And even the pedo stuff is merely the means to an end, and the end is power. Always power.
When news came out of Andrew’s death, I immediately thought of the possibility of an assassin ambushing him from behind a tree while he is strolling home from dinner, putting him in a chokehold/administering a fatal poison.
Then there’s the report that he didn’t have an autopsy, and the coroner who worked on him dying soon afterwards.
There is some perspective by Scott Adams (Dilbert) on this matter:
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/153821538056/about-pizzagate
The problem was, Breitbart walked into a bar which he frequented, and ordered a glass of wine. He collapsed after leaving the bar. If you got a guy in as the bartender, there is no need for confrontation, and it would be nearly undetectable.
The coroner in that office dying, supposedly from a suicide with cyanide if I recall, was very curious as well. I am not sure I would ever use cyanide, if I decided to cash out. Last thing I want is maybe feeling my back snap backward in two with muscle spasms and my joints dislocate right before I cash out. Give me a drug that at least feels pleasant. But who knows.
On Pizzagate, nothing is certain about it. The coded emails could mean anything. But I see the use of the FBI ID’d symbols as a hugely troubling anchor, that moors the whole thing. Once you see that, and then progress to the instagrams, and the artwork, and the sly innuendos, then it gets troubling. At the least the symbols make it look like they think child sex abuse is a joke, or a funny idea to bond over. Then they proceed to do scrubs of all the material, which makes it look even worse, like they felt it should be hidden.
What bothers me is the nature of pedophilia today, which seems to very often evolve into networking to practice it and share illicit material. If you know there are networks, and imagine what they would look like, this would be pretty close, especially once you see the symbols, and then see Hastert, a known pedophile in the mix, and then see all of them begin scrubbing their feeds, and switching them to private.
I would say the chances there is something bad going on there are a lot higher than 20 to 1, especially given the Hastert association, and the Saville, Freud, and Franklin Scandals, which seemed to show these characters do show up around government. What the probability is, I do not know, but I’d think it better than even.
Short answer… No
Longer answer, no he was referencing that time the guy made he acorn video where he was trying to get “help” starting a prostitution ring in an effort to expose their evil nature… (The cops were called after he left)
[…] “Breitbart Was Probing PizzaGate When He Mysteriously Died?” […]